These essays are an attempt to cope with the highly disparate—and often disparaging—positions taken with respect to two of Shakespeare's plays, and to produce a balanced view of what the author believes to be major dramatic achievements. Henry IV, Part Two is seen as a play making use of morality effects to indicate the depth of England's sickness and to show the pattern of life against which Hal arrives at the kingship; Hal is seen not as a man in whom the human touch dwindles as the hero emerges (Traversi's view) but as a king who is also a complex and moving human figure.Troilus and Cressida is seen not as a set of contrasts between Trojans and Greeks but as a tapestry in which both camps suffer from a perversion of both will and judgment; Troilus and Cressida both, in this view, emerge as more than usually sympathetic characters.
The Margery Bailey memorial lectures
I: The diseased state in Henry IV, part two: II: Reason and will in the disordered world of Troilus and Cressida
Reprints and Corporate Permissions
Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?
To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:
Academic Permissions
Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?
Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:
If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.
Related research
People also read lists articles that other readers of this article have read.
Recommended articles lists articles that we recommend and is powered by our AI driven recommendation engine.
Cited by lists all citing articles based on Crossref citations.
Articles with the Crossref icon will open in a new tab.