One of the major criticisms of conflict models has been that they fail to include such communication terms as threats, promises, credibility, and messages. This paper details an analytic model of the conflict situation which defines these terms with action alternatives, value and perception functions, and termination expressions. The utility of the model is demonstrated by the inclusion of new concepts, the description of a fictional conflict, and the deduction of new relationships among a set of axioms.
An analytic model of conflict
Reprints and Corporate Permissions
Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?
To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:
Academic Permissions
Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?
Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:
If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.
Related research
People also read lists articles that other readers of this article have read.
Recommended articles lists articles that we recommend and is powered by our AI driven recommendation engine.
Cited by lists all citing articles based on Crossref citations.
Articles with the Crossref icon will open in a new tab.