Levels of orientation and threat behavior were manipulated in contexts where subjects thought that they were in consensus‐seeking discussions. Dependent variables were subjects’ conciliatory behavior and levels of orientation and threat exhibited by the statements they chose. The high orientation condition was found to produce high orientation choices. The effect of threat level was complex. Women, in general, behaved more rationally than men to gain rewards.
Conciliation and verbal responses as functions of orientation and threat in group interaction
Reprints and Corporate Permissions
Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?
To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:
Academic Permissions
Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?
Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:
If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.
Related research
People also read lists articles that other readers of this article have read.
Recommended articles lists articles that we recommend and is powered by our AI driven recommendation engine.
Cited by lists all citing articles based on Crossref citations.
Articles with the Crossref icon will open in a new tab.