This study tested experimentally certain pragmatic consequences of questions like “Is the Pope Catholic” and “Is the Pope Presbyterian.” Results indicate that such questions are interpreted transparently, so that the answer to the original question asked is taken to be the same as the obvious answer to the existentially unrelated question. Variations in the syntactic/semantic form of such questions and in the situation producing them also had consequences, specifically for judgments of the interpersonal attitude and interpersonal competence of the individual using such questions as responses.
Does a duck have antlers? Some pragmatics of “transparent questions”
Reprints and Corporate Permissions
Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?
To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:
Academic Permissions
Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?
Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:
If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.
Related research
People also read lists articles that other readers of this article have read.
Recommended articles lists articles that we recommend and is powered by our AI driven recommendation engine.
Cited by lists all citing articles based on Crossref citations.
Articles with the Crossref icon will open in a new tab.