The impression management strategies embedded in the external discourse of an organization in crisis are identified and a typology of impression management strategies used by organizations is developed. Existing documents were used to collect 799 statements dealing with how stakeholders presently viewed or should view the organization. Ingratiation was the primary strategy appearing in the statements, with most ingratiation being self‐enhancing communication. No apologies were present. Different impression management strategies occurred in messages directed to different stakeholders. Intimidation was used with special interest groups. Denouncement strategies were embedded in messages to competitors, special interest groups, and suppliers. Results are discussed in light of institutional theory and the impression management literature.
Legitimation endeavors: Impression management strategies used by an organization in crisis
Reprints and Corporate Permissions
Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?
To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:
Academic Permissions
Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?
Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:
If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.
Related Research Data
Related research
People also read lists articles that other readers of this article have read.
Recommended articles lists articles that we recommend and is powered by our AI driven recommendation engine.
Cited by lists all citing articles based on Crossref citations.
Articles with the Crossref icon will open in a new tab.