292
Views
2
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Research Article

Mulching improved soil fertility, plant growth and productivity, and postharvest deficit irrigation reduced water use in sweet cherry orchards in a semi-arid region

, , ORCID Icon, ORCID Icon & ORCID Icon
Pages 1419-1436 | Received 20 Oct 2021, Accepted 26 Jun 2022, Published online: 10 Jul 2022
 

ABSTRACT

In the Okanagan Valley, sweet cherry production has expanded to higher latitudes due to climate change, but the availability of irrigation water is limited in this semi-arid region. Postharvest deficit irrigation (PDI) and organic mulches can reduce water use in orchards, but their interactive effects on soil fertility, water relations, and crop performance in new orchard environments are unknown. In a randomized block split-plot design, full irrigation (100%) or PDI (72–76% of full irrigation) was applied to the main plots, and mulches (compost, woodchips, bare) were subplots at three sites. Compost increased soil organic matter, nutrients, pH, and electrical conductivity over three seasons at all sites. Woodchips increased tree growth and foliar P and Mn, while compost increased some fruit quality attributes, and foliar P compared to bare soil. Relative to full, PDI saved 24–28% irrigation water after harvest per season at each site without affecting soil moisture and chemical properties, stem water potential, or crop performance, or interacting with mulch effects. These results suggest that in this semi-arid cherry growing region mulches are a promising strategy to maintain soil moisture and improve soil fertility and crop performance, and PDI can reduce water use after harvest without affecting commercial production.

Acknowledgements

The authors gratefully acknowledge the cherry orchardists who allowed us to conduct experiments in their orchards and the support provided by Tanja Voegel and numerous summer students from The University of British Columbia’s Okanagan campus, as well as technical staff from Agriculture and Agri-food Canada in Summerland, British Columbia.

Disclosure statement

The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.

Supplementary material

Supplemental data for this article can be accessed online at https://doi.org/10.1080/03650340.2022.2095621

Additional information

Funding

This work was supported by an anonymous private foundation, Agriculture and Agri-Food Canada and the British Columbia Agriculture & Food Climate Action Initiative under Growing Forward 2, a federal-provincial-territorial initiative. The program is delivered by the Investment Agriculture Foundation of British Columbia.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.