![Sample our Medicine, Dentistry, Nursing & Allied Health journals, sign in here to start your FREE access for 14 days]({"type":"image" , "src" : "/sda/5944/TOC-Subject-Sample-2021-Medicine-Dentistry-Nursing-Allied-Health.jpg"})
Abstract
This study aimed to evaluate the relationship between the diameters of the auditory and eighth cranial nerves and improvements in post-implant performance. Twenty prelingually deafened children (aged from 2.0 to 6.0 years) who received the Nucleus 24 cochlear implant participated in this study. All subjects had used their implant for at least 1 year after device connection. The diameters of cochlear and eighth cranial nerves were retrospectively measured on preoperative T2-weighted axial magnetic resonance image (MRI). In 17 of 20 subjects, the cochlear and eighth cranial nerves could be identified on MRI. The mean diameter of the cochlear and eighth cranial nerves were 0.9±0.2 mm and 1.2±0.3 mm, respectively. In the remaining three subjects, the cochlear and eighth cranial nerves could not be identified on MRI. These three subjects had significantly lower scores in the Infant–Toddler-Meaningful Auditory Integration Scale (IT-MAIS) than the other 17 subjects at 12 months post-implant. There was no significant correlation among the maximal diameters of the nerves and age, ECAP thresholds and IT-MAIS scores. A sufficient outcome from cochlear implantation can be expected when cochlear and eighth cranial nerves are depicted on MRI, regardless of the nerve diameters.
Morita T, Naito Y, Tsuji J, Nakamura T, Yamaguchi S, Ito J. Relationship between cochlear implant outcome and the diameter of the cochlear nerve depicted on MRI. Acta Otolaryngol 2004; Suppl. 551: 56–59.
Morita T, Naito Y, Tsuji J, Nakamura T, Yamaguchi S, Ito J. Relationship between cochlear implant outcome and the diameter of the cochlear nerve depicted on MRI. Acta Otolaryngol 2004; Suppl. 551: 56–59.