Restricted electricity use among poor urban households

Abstract

For a variety of reasons, this article argues, electricity must be seen by policy‐makers in South Africa not as the sole provider of all future household energy needs, but rather as one component of an energy mix which includes such ‘transitional’ fuels as coal, gas and paraffin. The reasons for this are that electricity is expensive for poor households; it is subject to power failures and disconnections for non‐payment; the poor find it difficult to monitor and to control their consumption; appliances are expensive and several are required to make best use of electricity; people prefer other fuels because they are familiar and have strong personal and cultural associations, and because Eskom is not trusted owing to its past ties to illegitimate local authorities and misunderstanding of electricity and how its use is monitored and charged for. Further, it is mistaken to equate ‘development’ with total electrification: most developed countries have fuel mixes which include gas and coal, particularly for cooking and heating. Accepting an affordable fuel mix for the poor in particular would focus attention on the problems currently associated with paraffin, gas and coal, namely fires, poisoning and air pollution.

Notes

Respectively, Professor, Department of Social Anthropology, University of Natal, Durban; Research Officer Institute for Social and Economic Research, Rhodes University; Senior Lecturer, Department of Social Anthropology, University of Natal, Durban; and Researcher, Energy for Development Research Centre, University of Cape Town. The authors gratefully acknowledge the financial assistance of the Department of Minerals and Energy.