The Capital City in the Context of accelerated Individualization. Reflections on the Bulgarian Experience

Abstract

Privatization and competitive politics brought about accelerated individualization in Bulgarian society. Both the constructive and destructive effects of individualization are particularly concentrated in the country's capital city. It rapidly shifted its economic structure from industry to services and re-oriented its territorial morphology from north-west to south-east. These changes mostly took place in a spontaneous and often anomic way thus provoking the need for a new Master Plan of the capital city. Sociological studies supported its preparation. Below the surface of a relatively stable size of the capital's population they revealed substantial migration to Sofia during the 1990s together with continuing large-scale emigration of the young, best educated and entrepreneurial population cohorts. Recent studies confirm this trend despite of the fact that the capital city is economically in the best position in comparison with all other settlements in the country. The conclusion is that the economic, political and cultural re-integration of Bulgarian society is still incomplete and this may be noticed in all its structural levels, administrative and territorial units, the capital city including. Thus, new institutional strategies are needed for coping with the effects of accelerated individualization. In the capital city, the core of these strategies should be the strengthening of the economic, political and cultural basis of its communal integration.

Keywords:

• Restructuring
• Individualization
• Migration
• Integraion

Notes

1. The representative national survey on Transformation Risks and Quality of Life was carried out as home interview on 1152 cases.

2. The data stem from the national surveys on Transformation Risks and Quality of Life carried out annually by a team headed by the present author.

3. According to data from the national representative surveys on Transformation Risks and Quality of Life.

4. According to data from the national representative surveys on Transformation Risks and Quality of Life.