696
Views
1
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Review

What makes us apes? The emotional building blocks of intersubjectivity in hominids

ORCID Icon, ORCID Icon & ORCID Icon
Pages 220-234 | Received 13 Jan 2022, Accepted 07 Feb 2022, Published online: 09 Mar 2022
 

Highlights

  1. Intersubjectivity has often been lauded as one of the defining features that separates humans and other extant hominids.

  2. Intersubjectivity and empathy are different, yet related, phenomena.

  3. The study of emotions and empathy-related abilities can provide insights into the ontogeny and evolution of intersubjectivity.

Intersubjectivity, which refers to the capacity to create shared value or connection between individuals, is a complex and multi-faceted phenomenon involving both cognitive and affective components. Intersubjectivity has often been lauded as one of the defining features that separates the social minds and existence of humans and non-human animals. Despite the apparently profound importance of inter-subjectivity for the socio-cognitive functioning of our species, we know surprisingly little about its evolution, nor how its evolution relates to the evolution of other related phenomena, such as empathy. In this review, we embrace the “bottom-up” perspective to consider recent theoretical and empirical advances in the fields of non-human animal cognition and emotion and what they can tell us about how complex socio-emotional capacities evolve. In particular, we focus on great ape species. Given their close phylogenetic relationship to us, great apes (the non-human, extant hominids) offer a unique lens to identify which of our capacities may be evolutionarily derived or phylogenetically shared.

DISCLOSURE STATEMENT

No potential conflict of interest was reported by the authors.

Additional information

Funding

Elisa Demuru has received financial support from the LabEX ASLAN – Advanced Studies on LANguage complexity (ANR-10-LABX-0081) and from the IDEXLYON (ANR-16-IDEX-005 and ANR-11-IDEX-0007) of the University of Lyon. Zanna Clay has received financial support from the European Research Council Starting Grant (802979) and from the UKRI Economic and Social Research Council Open Research Area Grant (grant number ES/S015612/1). Ivan Norscia has received financial support from the Fondazione CRT (Cassa di Risparmio di Torino, grant number 8365).

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.