Behavioural correlates of female zebra finch (Taeniopygia guttata) responses to multimodal species recognition cues

Abstract

Successful sexual reproduction requires accurate mate selection, including correct species recognition. When studying multimodal species recognition cues, uncorrelated presentations of visual and acoustic traits can be valuable tools for investigating the relative importance of various sensory modalities in the recognition process. Using a model system for species recognition research, the zebra finch (Taeniopygia guttata), we investigated captive-bred females' behavioural responses to video and acoustic playbacks of male conspecific or phylogeographically relevant heterospecific cues. Females consistently spatially preferred conspecific cues when acoustic and visual cues were presented together or acoustic-only cues were played back. In contrast, females showed no discrimination when visual cues only were available and when the visual and acoustic cues of stimulus species were experimentally mismatched. Subjects showed significant individual variation in their attentiveness to playback stimulus types. The relevance of this behavioural individuality to mate choice was confirmed by a correlation between a female's attentiveness and whether it became pair bonded with an unfamiliar male in a free-flight aviary paradigm. These results are consistent with acoustic cues being more salient than visual cues presented through video playbacks and suggest that consistency in behavioural variation in female zebra finches across testing contexts may be relevant for appropriate mate selection decisions.

Key Words:

• conspecific discrimination
• mate choice
• recognition cues
• species recognition

ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS

This research was supported by a University of Auckland Doctoral Scholarship (to D.L.M. Campbell) and grants from the University of Auckland Research Council (new staff, staff and ECRE funds) and the New Zealand Marsden Fund (to M.E. Hauber). We are grateful for comments of anonymous referees and discussions with members of the neuroethology tutorial group and the ecology and animal behaviour laboratory at the University of Auckland, J. Guilbert, W. Forstmeier, N. Langmore, I. MacDonald, K. Riebel, R. Shaw, M. Walker, S. Windsor, S. Woolley and many others. This study was approved by the University of Auckland Animal Ethics Committee.