474
Views
9
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
ORIGINAL ARTICLES

Public participation and legitimacy management in planning

A Habermasian Perspective to Finnish Welfarist Planning Tradition

ORCID Icon
Pages 309-328 | Received 22 May 2018, Accepted 23 May 2018, Published online: 07 Jun 2018
 

ABSTRACT

Communicative planning theory has assumed that legitimacy of planning could be enhanced by employing communicative and participatory planning methods. Although this assumption has been inspired by Habermas’s philosophy, communicative planning theorists have studied only some aspects of his theory of legitimacy. They have typically assessed legitimacy in the context of micro-scale communicative interactions, viewing Habermas’s philosophy as a source of communicative ideals. This paper, however, turns to Habermas’s macro-scale systems-theoretical analyses – such as the one presented in Legitimation Crisis – to find explanations for the fact that these ideals often do not come true: political and administrative decision-makers are not always working for turning ideals into practice but rather manage legitimacy by adhering to corporatist, exclusive, and interest group-based decision-making. The paper employs Habermas’s theory to analyse legitimacy management in the tradition of Finnish welfarist planning, a tradition that has been largely based on corporatist governance. Furthermore, it analyses the ways in which this mode of governance forms a trajectory in current neoliberalist governance hybrids in Finland, thus impeding the realisation of Habermasian communicative ideals. Finally, the paper argues that regardless of these impediments, the Habermasian ideals can still pose a challenge to the traditional legitimacy management of Finnish welfarist planning.

Acknowledgements

I wish to thank Andy Inch, Margo Huxley, Christer Bengs, and Jonne Hytönen for their useful comments on the earlier versions of this paper.

Disclosure statement

No potential conflict of interest was reported by the author.

Additional information

Funding

This work was supported by Academy of Finland [grant number 288848].

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.