153
Views
7
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Original Articles

The Vinaya and The Dharmaśāstra: Monastic Law and Legal Pluralism in Ancient India

Pages 33-65 | Published online: 02 Dec 2013
 

Abstract

It is argued that in ancient India the Buddhist Vinaya (the rules governing Buddhist monks) were not a form of customary law, but a wider system of jurisprudence linked to principles and precepts in the Dharma§āstra (the sacred literature of Hinduism). The Dharma§āstra, as a dominant legal system, allowed groups such as the Sangha (the Buddhist order of monks) to make and amend their own laws, giving rise to a form of ‘juridical legal pluralism’. The concept of legal pluralism also assists an understanding of how the Vinaya, as a subservient legal system, both sought to deploy norms outside of it for business advantages but also had to conform to wider norms to achieve social respect and acceptance.

The monks were directed to obey the ‘outside dictates’ of the Dharma§āstra, since this brought material benefits. The Sangha, developing at different times and in different ways in various parts of Asia, became increasingly prosperous. Consequently in the Vinaya it developed procedures for commercial transactions such as pledges. These were designed to comply with the requirements of the Dharma§āstra. The Sangha was also compelled to adhere to wider notions of Indian society, emanating from Hinduism, based on notions of purity and pollution. Thus rules were developed as to the understanding of questions of pollution and purity in relation to death, and as to the appropriate funeral procedures for monks. In relation to the transmission of the property and debt liabilities of deceased monks, the Vinaya took account both of the Dharma§?stra, where inheritance was linked to the performance of funeral rights and carried the obligation to meet the debts of the deceased, and the popular notion that a failure to meet debts resulted in pollution through contact with the body of the debtor.

References

Original Texts

  • B.D. (The Book of Discipline), Vols.I-VI, trans, from Vinaya Piṭakim, I. B. Horner, 1938–66. Oxford: Pali Text Society.
  • Bṛhaspati, trans. J. Jolly, Sacred Books of the East Vol. 33, 1889. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
  • Derge (Derge: The Tibetian Tripitaka), Taipei Edition, ed. A. W. Barber, 1991. Taipei: SMC Publishing.
  • Dharmaśāstras: The Law Codes of Ancient India, ed. P. Olivelle, 1999. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  • Dharmasūtra Parallels: Containing the Dharmasūtras of Āpastamba, Gautama, Baudhāyana and vasiṣṭha, ed. P. Olivelle, 2005. New Delhi: Motilal Banarsidass.
  • The Travels of Fa-hsien (399–414 AD) A Record of Buddhist Kingdoms, by Fahsien, trans. H.A. Giles, 1956. London: Routledge.
  • Jaina Sutras, trans. H. Jacobi, Sacred Books of the East, 1884–95. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
  • Kātyāyanasmṛti on Vyavahāra, trans P.V Kane, 1933. Bombay: Aryasamskrti Press.
  • Kauṭilīya Arthaśāstra, trans. R. P. Kangle, 1972. Bombay: Bombay University Press.
  • The Laws of Manu, trans. F. Muller, Sacred Books of the East Vol. 25, 1970. Delhi: Motilal Banarsidas.
  • Manu’s Code of Law, A Critical Edition and Translation of the Manava Dharmaśāstra, ed. P. Olivelle, 2005. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  • Hymns of the Rig Veda, 2 vols., trans. R.T.H. Griffiths, 1963. Bombay: Chowkhamba Sanskrit Series.
  • Khadgavisana-gatha: A Gāndhārī Version of the Rhinoceros Sūtra, British Library, Kharosthi Fragment 5B, trans. R. Salomon, 2000. Seattle: University of Washington Press.
  • Nāradasmṛti, trans. R. Lariviere, 1989. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.
  • Patimokka, trans. T.W. Rhys Davids and H. Oldenburg, Vinaya Texts S.B.E. Vol 13, 1981. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
  • Vinaya Piṭakim, ed. H. Oldenberg, 1879–83. London: Williams and Norgate.
  • Viṣṇ(1U, trans. 1. Jolly, Sacred Books of the East Vol.7, 1880. Oxford: Clarendon Press.

Secondary Literature

  • Agostini, G. 2002 Indian Views of the Buddhist Laity: Precepts and Upāsaka Status. Doctoral thesis, University of California, Berkeley.
  • Agrawal, K.B. 2006 Legal Pluralism in India. Nagar: Indian Institute of Comparative Law.
  • Ali, D. 1998 ‘Technologies of the Self: Courtly Artifice and Monastic Discipline in Early India.’ Journal of the Economic and Social History of the Orient 41: 159–84.
  • Bailey, G. and I. Mabbett 2006 The Sociology of Early Buddhism. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  • Benda-Beckmann, F. and K. von 2006 ‘The Dynamics of Change and Continuity in Plural Legal Orders.’ 53–54 Journal of Legal Pluralism 53–54: 1–44.
  • Benda-Beckmann, K. von 2001 ‘Folk, Indigenous and Customary Law.’ P. 5705 in N Smelser and N.J Baltes (eds.), International Encyclopedia of the Social and Behavioral Sciences. New York: Elsevier.
  • Bhagvat, D.N. 1939 Early Buddhist Jurisprudence. Poona: Oriental Book Agency.
  • Blackstone, W. 1857 Commentaries on the Laws of England. London: John Murray.
  • Bronkhorst,1. 2007 Greater Magadha. Leiden: E.J. Brill.
  • Callies, D. 2003 ‘How Custom Becomes Law in England.’ Pp. 158–223 in P. Orebech et al. (eds.), The Role of Customary Law in Sustainable Development. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  • Carrithers, M. 1983 The Forest Monks of Sri Lanka: An Anthropological and Historical Study. Delhi: Oxford University Press.
  • Chatterjee, H. 1971 The Law of Debt in Ancient India. Calcutta: Sanskrit College.
  • Clarke, S. 2006 Family Matters in Indian Monastic Buddhism. Doctoral Thesis, University of California, Los Angeles.
  • Davis, D. 1999 ‘Recovering the Indigenous Legal Traditions of India: Classical Hindu Law in Practice in Late Medieval Kerala.’ Journal of Indian Philosophy 27: 159–213.
  • Davis, D. 2004 The Boundaries of Hindu Law: Tradition, Custom and Politics in Medieval Kerala. Torino: Union Academique International.
  • Decaroli, R. 2004 Haunting the Buddha: Indian Popular Religions and the Formation of Buddhism. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  • Dehejia, V. 1972 Early Buddhist Rock Temples: A Chronology. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.
  • Derrett, J.D.M. 1963 Introduction to Modern Hindu Law. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  • Derrett, J.D.M. 1973 Dharmaśāstra and Juridical Literature. Wiesbaden: Otto Harrassowitz.
  • Derrett, J.D.M. 1974 ‘Nivi.’ Vishveshvaranand Indological Journal 12: 89–95.
  • Derrett, J.D.M. 1977a ‘Two recent inscriptions concerning the status of Kammalas and the application of the Dharmaśāstra’. Pp. 86–110 in J. D. M. Derrett, Essays in Classical and Modern Hindu Law, Vol. 1. Leiden: Brill.
  • Derrett, J.D.M. 1977b ‘The Development of the Concept of Property in India c. A.D 800–1800.’ Pp. 15–130 in J.D.M. Derrett, Essays in Classical and Modern Hindu Law, Vol. 2. Leiden: Brill.
  • Derrett, J.D.M. 1999 Law, Religion and the State in India. Delhi: Oxford University Press.
  • Dhirasekara, D.J. 1981 Buddhist Monastic Discipline. Colombo: M.D. Gunasena.
  • Dirks, N.B. 1996 The Hollow Crown: Ethnohistory of an Indian Kingdom. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.
  • Douglas, D. 1984 Purity and Danger: An Analysis of the Concepts of Pollution and Taboo. London: ARK Paperbacks.
  • Dumont, L. 1959 Homo Hierarchicus. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
  • Dumont, L. 1970 ‘World Renunciation in Indian Religions.’ Pp. 33–60 in L. Dumont, Religion/Politics and History in India: Collected Papers in Indian Sociology. Paris: Mouton.
  • Dumont, L. 1983 ‘The Debt to Ancestors and the Category of Sapinda.’ Pp. 1–20 in C. Malamoud (ed.), Debts and Debtors. New Delhi: Vikas Publishing.
  • Dutt, N. 1945 ‘Place of Laity in Early Buddhism.’ Indian Historical Quarterly 21: 163.
  • Dutt, S. 1962 Early Buddhist Monarchism. London: Allen and Unwin.
  • Bapat, D. G. (ed.) 1962 Srautakosah Sratakosa Encyclopedia of Vedic Sacrificial Literature, Vol. 1, English section. Poona.
  • Evison, G. 1989 Indian Death Rituals. Doctoral thesis, University of Oxford.
  • Findly, E.B. 2003 Dāna: Giving and Getting in Pali Buddhism. Delhi: Motilal Banarsidass.
  • Foucher, A. 1949 La vie du Buddha. Paris: Payot.
  • Gellner, G. 1992 Monk, Householder, and Tantric Priest: Newar Buddhism and its Hierarchy of Ritual. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  • Gernet, J. 1995 Buddhism in Chinese Society: An Economic History from the Fifth to the Tenth Centuries. New York: Columbia University Press.
  • Giddens A. 1979 Central Problems in Social Theory: Action, Structure and Contradiction in Social Analysis. London: Macmillan.
  • Glucklich, A. 1988 Religious Jurisprudence in the Dharmaśāstra, London: Macmillan.
  • Gombrich, R. 1995 ‘The Monk in the Pali Vinaya: Priest or Wedding Guest?’ Journal of the Pali Text Society 31: 193–7.
  • Gopal, L. 1961 ‘Ownership of Agricultural Land in Ancient India.’ Journal of the Economic and Social History of the Orient 4: 240–263.
  • Grero, C.A. 1996 An Analysis of the Theravada Vinaya in the Light of Modern Legal Philosophy. Colombo: Karunaratne.
  • Griffiths, J. 2001 ‘Legal Pluralism.’ Pp. 8650–8654 in N Smelser and N.J Baltes (eds.), International Encyclopedia of the Social and Behavioral Sciences. New York: Elsevier.
  • Gunawardana, R. 1979 Robe and Plough: Monasticism and Economic Interest in Early Medieval Sri Lanka. Tucson: University of Arizona Press.
  • Hallisey, C. 1995 ‘Roads taken and not taken in the study of Theravada Buddhism.’ Pp. 31–61 in D. Lopez (ed.), Curators of the Buddha: The Study of Buddhism under Colonialism. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
  • Harpham, G. 1987 The Ascetic Imperative in Culture and Criticism. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
  • Heim, M. 2004 Theories of the Gift in South Asia: Hindu, Buddhist and Jain Reflections on Dāna. New York: Routledge.
  • Hirakawa, A. 1990 A History of Buddhism. Honolulu: University of Hawaii Press.
  • Holt, J.C. 1981 Discipline and the Canonical Buddhism of the Vinaya Pitaka. Delhi: Motilal Banarasidass.
  • Hooker,B. 1975 Legal Pluralism: An Introduction to Colonial and Neo-Colonial Laws. Oxford: Clarendon.
  • Ingalls, D.H. 1954 ‘Authority and Law in Ancient India.’ Journal of the American Oriental Society: 34–45.
  • Jain, L.C. 1929 Indigenous Banking in India. London: Macmillan.
  • Jaini, P. 1980 ‘The Disappearance of Buddhism and the Survival of Jainism.’ In A.K Narain (ed.), Studies in the History of Buddhism. Delhi: BR Publishing House.
  • Jing Yin 2002 The Vinaya in India and China: Spirit and Transformation. Doctoral thesis, University of London.
  • Kane, P.V. 1962–1975 History of Dharmaśāstra, Vols. 1–5. Poona: Bhandarkar Oriental Research Institute.
  • Kosambi, D.D. 1985 An Introduction to the Study of Indian History. Bombay: Sangam Books.
  • Lamb, S. 2000 White Saris and Sweet Mangoes. Berkeley: University of California Press.
  • Lamotte, E 1988 History of Indian Buddhism: From the Origins to the Saka Era, trans. S. Webb-Boin. Louvain-la-Neuve: Peeters.
  • Lariviere, R.W. 2004 ‘Dharmaśāstra, Custom, “Real Law” and “Apocryphal” Smrtis.’ Journal. of Indian Philosophy 32: 611–627.
  • Lester, R.C. 1973 Theravada Buddhism in Southeast Asia. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.
  • Le Roy, E. 1998 ‘L’hypothèse du multijuridisme dans un contexte de sortie de modernité.’ Pp. 29–43 in L. André, R.A. MacDonald, R. Janda and G. Rocher (eds.), Théories et émergence du droit: pluralisme, surdétermination et effectivité. Bruxelles: Bruylant/Thémis.
  • Lingat, R. 1973 The Classical Law of India, trans. J.D.M. Derrett. Berkeley: University of California Press.
  • Liu Xinru 1994 Ancient India and Ancient China: Trade and Religious Exchanges A.D. 1–600. Delhi: Oxford University Press.
  • Mabbett,I. 1998 ‘Buddhism and Freedom.’ Pp. 19–36 in D. Kelly and A. Reid (eds.), Asian Freedoms: The Idea of Freedom in East and South East Asia. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  • Malamoud, C. 1996 ‘The Theology of Debt in Brahmanism.’ Pp. 92–108 in C. Malamoud (ed.), Cooking in the World: Ritual and Thought in Ancient India. Delhi: Oxford University Press.
  • Menski, W. 2002 ‘Hindu Law as a Religious System.’ Pp. 108–126 in A. Huxley (ed.) Religion. Law and Tradition. London: Routlege-Curzon.
  • Menski, W. 2003 Hindu Law: Beyond Tradition and Modernity. New Delhi: Oxford University Press.
  • Merry, S. 1997 ‘Legal Pluralism and Transnational Culture: The Ka Ho’okolokolonui Kanaka Maoli Tribunal Hawaii, 1993.’ pp. 28–48 in R. A. Wilson (ed.), Human Rights, Culture and Context: Anthropological Perspectives. London: Pluto Press.
  • Mills, M. 2000 ‘Vijra Brother Vajra Sister: Renunciation, Individualism and the Household in Tibetan Buddhist Monasticism.’ Journal of the Royal Anthropological Institute 5: 17–34.
  • Mills, M. 2005 ‘Living in Time’s Shadow: Pollution, Purification and the Fractured Temporalities in Buddhist Ladakh.’ In W. James and D. Mills (eds.), The Qualities of Time: Anthropological Approaches. Oxford: Berg.
  • Nath, V. 1987 Dāna: Gift System in Ancient India. Delhi: Munshiram Manoharlal.
  • Neelis, J .E. 2001 Long-Distance Trade and the Transmission of Buddhism, Primarily based on Kharosthi and Brahmi Inscriptions. Doctoral thesis, University of Washington.
  • Niyogi, P. 1973 ‘Organization of Buddhist Monasteries in Ancient Bengal and Bihar.’ Journal of Indian History 6: 531–557.
  • Olivelle, P. 1974 The Origin and Early Development of Buddhist Monarchism. Colombo: Gunasena.
  • Olivelle, P. 1984 ‘Renouncer and Renunciation in the Dharmaśāstras.’ Pp. 81–152 in R.W. Lariviere (ed.), Studies in Dharmaśāstra. Calcutta: Firma KLM.
  • Olivelle, P. 1990 ‘Village vs Wilderness: Ascetic Ideals in the Hindu World.’ Pp, 125–160 in A.B. Creel and V. Narayanan (eds.), Monastic Life in the Christian and Hindu Traditions. Lewiston: Melon Press.
  • Olivelle, P. 1993 The Asrama System: The History and Hermeneutics of Religious Institution. New York: Oxford University Press.
  • Olivelle, P. 1995 Rules and Regulations of Brahmanical Asceticism Yatidharmasamuccaya of Yadava Prakāśa. New York: State University of New York Press.
  • Olivelle, P. 1999 ‘Introduction.’ In P. Olivelle (ed.), Dharmasatras: The Law Codes of Ancient India. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  • Olivelle, P. 2006a ‘Explorations in the Early History of the Dharmaśāstra.’ In P. Olivelle, Between the Empires: Society in India 300 BCE to 400 CE. New Delhi: Oxford University Press.
  • Olivelle, P. 2006b ‘The Ascetic and the Domestic in Brahmanical Religiosity.’ Pp. 25–42 in O. Freiberger (ed.), Asceticism and its Critics: Historical Accounts Comparative Perspectives. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  • Prebish, C. 1975 Buddhist Monastic Discipline. University Park Pennsylvania: Pennsylvania State University Press.
  • Ray, H.P. 1994 The Winds of Change: Buddhism and the Maritime Links of Early South Asia. Delhi: Oxford University Press.
  • Ray,R. 1999 Buddhist Saints in India: A Study in Buddhist Values and Orientations. New York: Oxford University Press.
  • Roberts, S. 2005 ‘After Government? On Representing Law Without the State.’ Modern Law Review 68: 1–24.
  • Rocher,L. 1972 ‘Hindu Law and Religion: Where to Join the Line.’ pp. 167–194 in Malik Ram Felicitation Volume. New Delhi: Zaidi.
  • Samuels, J. 1999 ‘Views of Householders and Lay Disciples and the Sutta Pitaka: A Reconsideration of the Lay/ Monk Opposition.’ Religion 29: 231–241.
  • Samuels, G. 2003 ‘Monasticism.’ P. 560 in R. Buswell (ed.), Encyclopedia of Buddhism. New York: Macmillan.
  • Sarao, K.T.S. 2002 ‘Double Tragedy: A Reappraisal of the Decline of Buddhism in India.’ International Journal of Buddhist Thought and Culture 1: 1–14.
  • Schopen, G. 1997a Bones, Stones and Buddhist Monks. Honolulu: University of Hawaii.
  • Schopen, G. 1997b ‘Archaeology and Protestant Presuppositions in the Study of Indian Buddhism.’ Pp. 1–22 in Schopen 1997a.
  • Schopen, G. 1997c ‘Two Problems in the History of Buddhism: The Layman/ Monk Distinction and the Doctrines of the Transference of Merit.’ Pp. 23–55 in Schopen 1997a.
  • Schopen, G. 1997d ‘Filial Piety and the Monk in the Practice of Indian Buddhism : A Question of “Sinicization“ Viewed from the Other Side.’ Pp. 56–71 in Schopen 1997a.
  • Schopen, G. 1997e ‘The Ritual Obligations and Donor Roles of Monks in the Pali Vinaya.’ Pp. 72–85 in Schopen 1997a.
  • Schopen, G. 1997f ‘Monks and the Relic Cult in the Mahaparinibbana-suta: An old Misunderstanding in Regard to Monastic Buddhism.’ Pp. 99–113 in Schopen 1997a.
  • Schopen, G. 1997g ‘On Avoiding Ghosts and Social Censure: Monastic Funerals in the Mūlasarvāstivāda-Vinaya.’ Pp. 204–237 in Schopen 1997a.
  • Schopen, G. 1997h ‘On Monks, Nuns and “Vulgar Practices”: The Introduction of the Image Cult into Indian Buddhism.’ pp. 238–257 in Schopen 1997a.
  • Schopen, G. 1997i ‘The Buddha as Owner of Property and Permanent Residence in Medieval Indian Monasteries.’ Pp. 258–291 in Schopen 1997a.
  • Schopen, G. 2003 ‘Vinaya.’ Pp. 885–889 in R. Buswell (ed.), Encyclopedia of Buddhism. New York: Macmillan.
  • Schopen, G. 2004a Buddhist Monks and Business Matters: Still More Papers on Monastic Buddhism in India. Honolulu: University of Hawaii Press.
  • Schopen, G. 2004b ‘The Good Monk and His Money in Buddhism Monasticism of “the Mahayana Period”.’ Pp. 1–18 in Schopen 2004a.
  • Schopen, G. 2004c ‘Art, Beauty and the Business of Running a Buddhist Monastery in Early North Western India.’ pp. 19–45 in Schopen 2004a.
  • Schopen, G. 2004d ‘Doing Business for the Lord: Lending on Interest and Written-Loan Contacts in the Mūlasarvāstivāāda-Vinaya.’ Pp. 45–90 in Schopen 2004a.
  • Schopen, G. 2004e ‘Deaths, Funerals and the Division of Property in the Monastic Code.’ Pp. 91–121 in Schopen 2004a.
  • Schopen, G. 2004f ‘Dead Monks and Bad Debts: Some Provisions of a Monastic Inheritance Law.’ pp. 122–169 in Schopen 2004a.
  • Schopen, G. 2004g ‘Monastic Law Meets the Real World: A Monk’s Continuing Right to Inherit Family Property in Classical India.’ Pp. 170–192 in Schopen 2004a.
  • Schopen, G. 2004h ‘The Monastic Ownership of Servants and Slaves: Local and Legal Factors in the Redactional History of the Two Vinayas.’ Pp. 193–218 in Schopen 2004a.
  • Schopen, G. 2004i ‘The Lay Ownership of Monasteries and the Role of the Monk in the Mūlasarvāstivāda-Vinaya.’ pp. 219–259 in Schopen 2004a.
  • Schopen, G. 2004j ‘Ritual Rights and Bones of Contention: More on Monastic Funerals and Relics in the Mūlasarvāstivāda-Vinaya.’ Pp. 285–328 in Schopen 2004a.
  • Schopen, G. 2007 ‘Cross-Dressing with the Dead: Asceticism, Ambivalence, and Institutional Values in an Indian Monastic Code.’ Pp. 60–104 in B. Cuevas and J. Stone (eds.), The Buddhist Dead: Practices, Discourses, Representations. Honolulu: University of Hawaii Press.
  • Silber, I. 1995 Virtuosity, Charisma, and the Social Order. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  • Sternbach, L. 1965 Juridical Studies in Ancient India, Vol. 1. Delhi: Motilal Banarsidass.
  • Stewart, I. 2006 ‘Customs in Common: The Old Emperor’s Clothes.’ Macquarie Law Journal 6: 139–160.
  • Strenski, I. 1983 ‘On Generalised Exchange and the Domestication of the Sangha.’ Man (ns) 18: 463–477.
  • Sujato, Bhikkhu 2006 Sects and Sectarianism: The Origin of the Buddhist Schools. Taipei: Santi Forest Monastery.
  • Tachibana, S. 1992 Ethics of Buddhism. London: Curzon Press.
  • Thapar, R. 1978 ‘Renunciation: The Making of a Counter-Culture?’ Pp. 63–104 in R. Tharpar, Ancient Indian Social History: Some Interpretations. New Delhi: Orient Longmans.
  • Tsuchida, R. 1991 ‘Two Categories of Brahmins in the Early Buddhist Period.’ Memoirs of the Research Department of the Toyo Bunko: 51–95.
  • Visser, A.M. and A. McIntosh, A. 1988 ‘A Short Review of the Historical Critique of Usury.’ Accounting Business and Financial History 8: 175–189.
  • Voyce, M. 1984 ‘The Communal Discipline of the Buddhist Order of Monks: The Sanction of the Vinaya Pitaka.’ American Journal of Jurisprudence 29: 123–150.
  • Voyce, M. 1986 ‘Some Observations on the Relationship between the King and the Buddhist Order in Ancient India.’ Journal of Legal Pluralism 24: 127–150.
  • Weber, M. 1958 The Religion of India. Glencoe Ill: Free Press.
  • Wijayaratna, M. 1990 Buddhist Monastic Life. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  • Zaehner, R. 1974 ‘Introduction.’ in Olivelle 1974

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.