https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3538-9023
![Sample our Health and Social Care journals, sign in here to start your FREE access for 14 days]({"type":"image" , "src" : "/sda/5938/TOC-Subject-Sample-2021-Health-Social-Care.jpg"})
Abstract
Objectives
Exploring CaringBridge, we describe types of social support caregivers requested, types of social support offered, and the alignment between the two.
Research approach
A retrospective, longitudinal, descriptive approach.
Sample
Twenty public CaringBridge sites.
Methodological approach
The Social Support Behavior Code system was adapted and applied to cancer-caregiver journal entries (n = 389) and guestbook posts (n = 2,466) to identify types of support (emotional, esteem, informational, network, tangible, and no support requested/offered). Matches between requests and offers were examined.
Findings
Cancer caregivers requested different types of support from their guests, most commonly emotional support. However, in most posts, caregivers did not request any support (n = 238, 61.18%). Guests offered all support types, but predominately offered emotional support (n = 2,353, 95%). When support was requested, 66.67% of requests received a matched offer within 24 hours.
Interpretation
Social media platforms may provide all types of support to caregivers.
Data availability statement
The data that support the findings of this study are openly available at https://doi.org/10.18738/T8/FLQZP8, Texas Data Repository Dataverse.
Acknowledgments
The authors would like to acknowledge AnnMarie Walton PhD for her contributions as second coder for this manuscript.