Posterior Average Effects

Abstract

Economists are often interested in estimating averages with respect to distributions of unobservables, such as moments of individual fixed-effects, or average partial effects in discrete choice models. For such quantities, we propose and study posterior average effects (PAE), where the average is computed conditional on the sample, in the spirit of empirical Bayes and shrinkage methods. While the usefulness of shrinkage for prediction is well-understood, a justification of posterior conditioning to estimate population averages is currently lacking. We show that PAE have minimum worst-case specification error under various forms of misspecification of the parametric distribution of unobservables. In addition, we introduce a measure of informativeness of the posterior conditioning, which quantifies the worst-case specification error of PAE relative to parametric model-based estimators. As illustrations, we report PAE estimates of distributions of neighborhood effects in the U.S., and of permanent and transitory components in a model of income dynamics.

Keywords:

• Empirical Bayes
• Latent variables
• Model misspecification
• Posterior conditioning
• Robustness
• Sensitivity analysis

Acknowledgments

We thank to two anonymous referees, Manuel Arellano, Tim Armstrong, Raj Chetty, Tim Christensen, Nathan Hendren, Peter Hull, Max Kasy, Derek Neal, Jesse Shapiro, Xiaoxia Shi, Danny Yagan, and audiences at various places for comments.

Additional information

Funding

Bonhomme acknowledges support from the NSF, Grant SES-1658920. Weidner acknowledges support from the Economic and Social Research Council through the ESRC Centre for Microdata Methods and Practice grant RES-589-28-0001 and from the European Research Council grants ERC-2014-CoG-646917-ROMIA and ERC-2018-CoG-819086-PANEDA.