119
Views
3
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Article

Aphorisms, Enthymemes, and Oliver Wendell Holmes, Jr. on the First Amendment

Pages 219-235 | Published online: 14 Jun 2008
 

Abstract

By relying on Oliver Wendell Holmes's decisions as a Supreme Court Justice, I argue that aphorisms employ enthymematic reasoning and that enthymemes are best conveyed through aphorisms. Such an argument requires that I classify Holmes's decisions as aphorisms and show how Holmes explicitly rejects formal, legal rhetoric. These two moves are most clear in his First Amendment decisions, and it is these decisions that demonstrate how Holmes rethinks, broadly, the relationship between rhetoric and law. Holmes's position on the First Amendment, informed by the relationship between aphorisms and enthymemes, helps show how style is constitutive of reason.

Notes

1I thank RR reviewer John Gage for his thoughtful, extensive, and rigorous review of this manuscript.

2In what follows I rely extensively on Max Lerner's excellent collection of Holmes's writings, The Mind and Faith of Justice Holmes: His Speeches, Essays, Letters, and Judicial Opinions. All references to quotations from Holmes's decisions and essays are taken from this anthology.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.