Publication Cover
Drying Technology
An International Journal
Volume 26, 2008 - Issue 7
383
Views
19
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Original Articles

Optimization of Fluidized Bed Drying Process of Green Peas Using Response Surface Methodology

, , &
Pages 920-930 | Published online: 24 Jun 2008
 

Abstract

The fluidized bed drying process of green peas was optimized using the response surface methodology for the process variables: drying air temperature (60–100°C), tempering time (0–60 min), pretreatment, and mass per unit area (6.3–9.5 g/cm2). The green peas were pretreated by pricking, hot water blanching, or chemical blanching. Product quality parameters such as rehydration ratio, color, texture, and appearance were determined and analyzed. Second-order polynomial equations, containing all the process variables, were used to model the measured process and product qualities. Rehydration ratio was influenced mostly by pretreatment followed by tempering time, temperature, and mass per unit area. Pretreatment and mass per unit area significantly affected color and texture. Higher levels of temperature and lower levels of tempering time and mass per unit area increased the rehydration ratio. The optimum process conditions were derived by using the contour plots on the rehydration ratio and sensory scores generated by the second-order polynomials. Optimum conditions of 79.4°C drying air temperature, 35.8-min tempering time, pretreatment of the once pricked peas with chemical blanching in a solution of 2.5% NaCl and 0.1% NaHCO3, and mass per unit area of 6.8 g/cm2 were recommended for the fluidized bed drying of green peas. At these conditions the rehydration ratio was 3.49.

ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS

We thank the Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada (NSERC) for partial funding of this study.

Notes

a Code 0 is for center point of the parameter range investigated, ±1 for factorial points, and ±2 for augmented points; X 1 for temperature (°C), X 2 for tempering time (min), X 3 for pretreatment, and X 4 for mass per unit area (g/cm2).

b Factorial points were in half replication.

a CBLL stands for chemical blanching in a solution of 2.5% NaCl and 0.1% NaHCO3, P1 for pricking once, HWB for hot water blanching, P2 for pricking twice, CBHL for chemical blanching in a solution of 5% NaCl and 0.1% NaHCO3.

X 1 is the temperature (°C), X 2 the tempering time (min), X 3 the pretreatment, and X 4 the mass per unit area (g/cm2).

a F-table14,16,0.95 = 2.38.

∗∗Significant at P ≤ 0.05.

∗∗, ∗Coefficient significant at P ≤ 0.05, P ≤ 0.01, respectively; nsCoefficient insignificant.

X 1 is the temperature (°C), X 2 the tempering time (min), X 3 the pretreatment, and X 4 the mass per unit area (g/cm2).

a Type of pretreatment was decided based on the closest integer values; X 1 is the temperature (°C), X 2 the tempering time (min), X 3 the pretreatment, and X 4 the mass per unit area (g/cm2).

a Best result.

b Second best result.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.