Publication Cover
Drying Technology
An International Journal
Volume 32, 2014 - Issue 4
244
Views
9
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Original Articles

Influence of Processing Conditions on the Physicochemical Properties and Shelf-Life of Spray-Dried Palm Sugar (Arenga pinnata) Powder

 

Abstract

The influence of spray-drying conditions on some physicochemical properties of palm-sugar powder ( Arenga pinnata ) was studied. Twenty tests were carried out according to a central composite design. Independent variables were: inlet temperature (150–190°C), feed flow rate (9–21 g/min), and maltodextrin concentration (14–25%). Process yield, hygroscopicity, and outlet temperature were analyzed as responses. Results revealed that increasing inlet temperature resulted in higher process yield and outlet temperature and a lower hygroscopicity. Similarly, higher inlet temperature led to lower moisture content, dissolution rate, and total phenolic content of the powder. Conversely, the feed flow rate negatively influenced process yield and hygroscopicity, and positively influenced moisture content. Moreover, maltodextrin exhibited negative influence on process yield and hygroscopicity, respectively. Moreover, storage (30°C, six months) led to noticeable losses in flowability and wettability. Powder morphology was also influenced by the inlet temperature. Lower inlet temperature resulted in particles with shrivelled surfaces while higher temperature produced a greater number of larger particles with smooth surfaces.

Notes

b i The estimated regression coefficient for the main linear effects

(b 1, b 2, b 3)

b ii The estimated regression coefficient for the quadratic effects

(, , )

b ij The estimated regression coefficient for the interaction effects

(b 12, b 13, b 23)

1Inlet temperature; 2Feed flow rates; 3Maltodextrin concentra-

tions

*Significant (P <0.05); +Not significant (P > 0.05)

*Significant (P <0.05)

+Not significant (P > 0.05)

Y 0:Experimental value, Y 1: Predicted value, Y 0–Y 1: Residue

a No significant difference (P > 0.05) between experimental and predicted values

1: Inlet temperature of 136.36°C; 2: Inlet temperature of 150°C; 3: Inlet temperature of 170°C; 4: Inlet temperature of 190°C; 5: Inlet temperature of 203.64°C.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.