Abstract
Self-care practices such as exercise and meditation are commonly identified as strategies to address stress and chronic disease. However, in occupational therapy, the term self-care has traditionally referred to basic activities of daily living (ADL), potentially limiting the profession’s ability to promote wellness among clients. This scoping review aimed to clarify how the term self-care has been used in select occupational therapy literature. We found that of 1,254 included articles, 54.9% use the term self-care ambiguously and that authors primarily apply the term to basic ADL. This understanding contrasts with the evidence from the wellness literature and the concept’s use by the general population and other health professions. Findings serve as a call to redefine the term self-care to articulate clearly the profession’s value in promoting population health and well-being.
Keywords:
Correction Statement
This article has been republished with minor changes. These changes do not impact the academic content of the article.
Additional information
Notes on contributors
Isabelle Laposha
Isabelle Laposha, OTD completed this project in partial fulfillment of her doctoral degree at the Program in Occupational Therapy at Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO. Stacy Smallfield, DrOT, MSOT, OTR/L, BCG, FAOTA, is Associate Professor of Occupational Therapy and Medicine and Assistant Director, Occupational Therapy Entry-Level Professional Programs at Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO.