147
Views
2
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Research Articles

Structural basis of the key residue W320 responsible for Hsp90 conformational change

, &
Pages 9745-9755 | Received 07 Jul 2022, Accepted 06 Nov 2022, Published online: 14 Nov 2022
 

Abstract

The 90-kDa heat shock protein (Hsp90) is a homodimeric molecular chaperone with ATPase activity, which has become an intensely studied target for the development of drugs for the treatment of cancer, neurodegenerative and infectious diseases. The equilibrium between Hsp90 dimers and oligomers is important for modulating its function. In the absence of ATP, the passive chaperone activity of Hsp90 dimers and oligomers has been shown to stabilize client proteins as a holdase, which enhances substrate binding and prevents irreversible aggregation and precipitation of the substrate proteins. In the presence of ATP and its associated cochaperones, Hsp90 homodimers act as foldases with the binding and hydrolysis of ATP driving conformational changes that mediate client folding. Crystal structures of both wild type and W320A mutant Hsp90αMC (middle/C-terminal domain) have been determined, which displayed a preference for hexameric and dimeric states, respectively. Structural analysis showed that W320 is a key residue for Hsp90 oligomerization by forming intermolecular interactions at the Hsp90 hexameric interface through cation-π interactions with R367. W320A substitution results in the formation of a more open conformation of Hsp90, which has not previously been reported, and the induction of a conformational change in the catalytic loop. The structures provide new insights into the mechanism by which W320 functions as a key switch for conformational changes in Hsp90 self-oligomerization, and binding cochaperones and client proteins.

Communicated by Ramaswamy H. Sarma

Acknowledgements

We gratefully acknowledge the staff of beam-line 19ID at the Advanced Photon Source for their support.

Disclosure statement

No potential conflict of interest was reported by the authors.

Author contributions

R.L.M. and J.D. designed research; S.P. determined the structures. S.P., R.L.M. and J.D. analyzed data and wrote the paper.

Additional information

Funding

This work is supported by NIH grant R15CA219907 (R.L.M., J.D.) and Oklahoma Agricultural Experiment Station at Oklahoma State University under project OKL03060 (J.D.) and OKL03159 (R.L.M.). J.D. is additionally supported by NIH AI149295. The research is also supported in part by an Institutional Development Award (IDeA) from the National Institute of General Medical Sciences of the National Institutes of Health (Award P20GM103640).

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.