26
Views
25
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Articles on criminal justice

Have community supervision officers changed their attitudes toward their work?

, &
Pages 233-246 | Published online: 22 Aug 2006
 

Studies of probation and parole officers' attitudes conducted in the 1960s and 1970s indicated respondents' preference for assistance over authority as the most important goal of community supervision. The present research compares results obtained from the 1970s and 1980s applications of the Authority/Assistance Questionnaire and the Correctional Policy Inventory. The findings point not only to increased concern for authority but also to the diminished meaningfulness of the assistance objective. The authors suggest that a new emphasis on surveillance, in which delivery on service is largely a means for monitoring client risk, has “crowded” the rehabilitative ideal.

This research was supported by Grant Number 83-IJ-CX-0005 from the National Institute of Justice, U.S. Department of Justice. Points of view or opinions stated in this document are those of the authors and do not necessarily represent the official positions or policies of the Department of Justice. An earlier version of this paper was presented at the annual meetings of the American Society of Criminology on November 10, 1983 in Denver.

This research was supported by Grant Number 83-IJ-CX-0005 from the National Institute of Justice, U.S. Department of Justice. Points of view or opinions stated in this document are those of the authors and do not necessarily represent the official positions or policies of the Department of Justice. An earlier version of this paper was presented at the annual meetings of the American Society of Criminology on November 10, 1983 in Denver.

Notes

This research was supported by Grant Number 83-IJ-CX-0005 from the National Institute of Justice, U.S. Department of Justice. Points of view or opinions stated in this document are those of the authors and do not necessarily represent the official positions or policies of the Department of Justice. An earlier version of this paper was presented at the annual meetings of the American Society of Criminology on November 10, 1983 in Denver.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.