Determinate sentencing: A feminist and postmodern story

In this article I employ the concept of storytelling, as developed in feminist and postmodern theory, to explore the assumptions underlying the story about determinate sentencing that has dominated sentencing research and policy since the 1970s. Four analytic tools embedaed in storytelling—a critique of objectivity, a focus on process, an understanding of identity, and a new conceptualization of power—are used to investigate core assumptions that guide determinate sentencing policy. Finally, I offer a new story about sentencing and argue that the incarceration crisis fostered by current sentencing policy is in part a crisis of imagination.

Thanks to many supportive colleagues at Northern Arizona University for editorial suggestions and constructive comments: Fred Solop, Raymond Michalowski, Jeff Ferrell, Alison Brown, Alex Alvarez, and Phoebe Stambaugh. This research was funded by an Organized Research grant from Northern Arizona University.

Thanks to many supportive colleagues at Northern Arizona University for editorial suggestions and constructive comments: Fred Solop, Raymond Michalowski, Jeff Ferrell, Alison Brown, Alex Alvarez, and Phoebe Stambaugh. This research was funded by an Organized Research grant from Northern Arizona University.

Notes

Thanks to many supportive colleagues at Northern Arizona University for editorial suggestions and constructive comments: Fred Solop, Raymond Michalowski, Jeff Ferrell, Alison Brown, Alex Alvarez, and Phoebe Stambaugh. This research was funded by an Organized Research grant from Northern Arizona University.