435
Views
1
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Major Articles

Analysis of end-user satisfaction with electronic health records in college/university healthcare

, PhD, , PhD, , MSW, MBA, & , BEE
Pages 717-723 | Received 29 Oct 2019, Accepted 26 Apr 2020, Published online: 12 Jun 2020
 

Abstract

Objective

To determine levels of Electronic Health Record (EHR) satisfaction in order to add to the body of knowledge and assist professionals in the college/university health field with system/vendor selection. Methods: Nine health centers, all within highly selective colleges and universities, participated in this benchmarking study. Multidisciplinary staff (n = 316) received an anonymous 32-item survey to assess levels of agreement/satisfaction on statements pertaining to their EHR’s functionality. Results: The EHRs most commonly used were Point and Click, Medicat, Allscripts, and EPIC. There was considerable variation on levels of user satisfaction/agreement within features among the EHR systems, but differences were not statistically significant. Conclusion: No systems emerged as clear “winners” in terms of user satisfaction. Features were identified within systems that can be leveraged to meet specific care delivery and quality reporting needs among college/university health professionals, and could be considered in the use of EHRs by health services.

Acknowledgments

The authors acknowledge the contributions of the survey liaisons – Kelan Beacham, Sharon Casey, Jennifer Connor, Lynn Dupont, Jill Farrington, Jennifer Franssen, Madeline Anne Haftel, M. David Leenders. Daniel Longaker, P. Michael McNeil, Chris Payne, Stephanie Shapiro, Kristie Sullivan, Liebe Meier Swain, and Lisa Wohlert.

Conflict of interest disclosure

The authors have no conflicts of interest to report. The authors confirm that the research presented in this article met the ethical guidelines, including adherence to the legal requirements, of the United States of America and received approval from the Institutional Review Board of Princeton University.

Funding

No funding was used to support this research and/or the preparation of the manuscript.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.