The threat hypothesis: A conceptual and empirical defense

Abstract

A detailed rebuttal of Chambers' critique of the death threat literature is presented. Close examination of Chambers' argument reveals that his position is grounded in an incomplete understanding of both personal construct theory and other cognitive theories, and fails to consider the substantial empirical literature demonstrating the validity of the Threat Index, Moreover, the results of a preliminary study conducted to test his assertions yielded little evidence supporting his criticism. It is concluded that the threat hypothesis remains viable, although further work might extend and clarify its implications for thanatological research.