Two Versions of the Contrasting-Groups Standard-Setting Method: A Review: Measurement and Evaluation in Counseling and Development: Vol 35, No 3

Views

CrossRef citations to date

Altmetric

Abstract

This article reviews the literature on the contrasting-groups standard-setting method and describes 2 versions of the method—the person-focused version and the response-focused version. Of the 2, the response-focused version is preferable. It can be enhanced by adopting some practices of the modified Angoff method.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Order Reprints Request Corporate Permissions

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

Request Academic Permissions

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.

Two Versions of the Contrasting-Groups Standard-Setting Method: A Review

Information for

Open access

Opportunities

Help and information

Your download is now in progress and you may close this window

Login or register to access this feature

Two Versions of the Contrasting-Groups Standard-Setting Method: A Review

Abstract

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Academic Permissions

Related research

To cite this article:

Download citation

Information for

Open access

Opportunities

Help and information

Keep up to date