1,224
Views
8
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Review Article

Blood laboratory testing for early prediction of preeclampsia: chasing the finish line or at the starting blocks?

, , &
Pages 240-253 | Received 22 Jul 2016, Accepted 26 Oct 2016, Published online: 29 Nov 2016
 

Abstract

Preeclampsia (PE) affects 2–8% of pregnancies worldwide, thus representing an important cause of maternal and neonatal morbidity, up to death. Many studies have been designed to identify putative biomarkers for accurate and timely diagnosing PE, but only some of them were focused on specific and sensitive biomarkers for early prediction of this life-threatening condition. In particular, some prospective studies aimed to investigate the predictive role of circulating biomarkers before 20 weeks of gestation in the general pregnant population yielded conflicting results. This article is hence centered on results obtained in studies investigating the predictive performances of angiogenic, anti-angiogenic, inflammatory, endocrine, and epigenetic biomarkers. The available evidence suggests that angiogenic and anti-angiogenic molecules, in particular the sFlt1:PlGF ratio, may be considered the biomarkers with the best diagnostic performance in the second trimester. However, doubts remain about their use in clinical settings before the 20th gestational week. Even lower evidence is available for other biomarkers, due to the fact that some positive results have not been confirmed in ensuing investigations, whereas unresolved analytical issues still contribute to make their clinical reliability rather questionable. Differential expression of microRNAs seems also a promising evidence for early prediction of PE, but additional research and well-designed prospective studies are needed to identify and validate routine predictive tests.

    KEY MESSAGES

  • Preeclampsia affects 2–8% of pregnant women worldwide, thus remaining one of the leading causes of maternal and neonatal morbidity and mortality.

  • Several studies have investigated the predictive role of circulating biomarkers before 20th week of gestation with conflicting results.

  • Additional research and well-designed prospective studies are needed to identify and validate predictive tests in clinical practice.

Disclosure statement

The authors report no conflicts of interest.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.