Frameworked futures: Intransigence and flexibility in the northern Ireland elections of may 30 1996

Abstract

The elections of May 30th 1996 were a precursor to potentially extensive negotiations over the future of Northern Ireland. However, the rejection of compromise by even their chosen representatives among Protestant voters may effectively shackle attempts at negotiation. Protestant inflexibility over constitutional change, or the proposals for revised electoral procedures, power sharing, parity of esteem, or a North‐South body contained within the Framework Document likewise contrasts markedly with the wide range of options endorsed by Catholics. The explanation for this intransigence derives from the threat posed by any compromises to the position of the unionist community. It provides a significant but not insuperable constraint on prospects for negotiated solutions to the Northern Irish conflict.