169
Views
18
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Original Article

Rates for civil commitment to psychiatric hospitals in Norway. Are registry data accurate?

, &
Pages 301-307 | Published online: 01 Sep 2009
 

Abstract

Civil commitment rates to psychiatric hospitals in Norway are among the highest in Europe. However, published rates are based on registry data of uncertain quality. Civil commitment at four psychiatric hospitals were examined and the quality of registry data assessed. We examined 2043 admissions, recorded the duration of deprivation of liberty and calculated incidence rates for civil commitment. The overall study generated incidence rate for civil commitment based on “involuntary referrals”, “treatment periods” and persons involved were 259, 209 and 186 per 100,000 adults/year, respectively. For patients admitted for involuntary observation only, the mean duration of deprivation of liberty was 8.5 days, compared with 34.3 days for those admitted for long-term detention, representing 37.8% and 86.6% of the total inpatient period, respectively. The submitted records to the Norwegian Patient Registry (NPR) were incomplete and had missing information at two of the four hospitals. Moreover, when official civil commitment rates based on the NPR data were computed, almost 30% of all admissions were routinely excluded. Civil commitment in this study was higher than corresponding figures based on registry data. In general, civil commitment rates as reported by the NPR seem to be an underestimate.

Notes

1. Computed for all inhabitants the rate will decrease to 165 per 100,000/year.

2. All mental health institutions in Norway report performance indicators including the use of legal coercion to the NPR. Based on these registry data annual reports on mental health services in Norway are prepared. These reports are regarded as “official” or “national” statistics.

3. All patients that had their legal status changed from involuntary observation to long-term detention were included among long-term detentions. Thus, when we refer to those “committed for observation only” in this paper, these conversions are excluded from this legal group.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.