233
Views
4
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Research

Live teleophthalmology avoids escalation of referrals to secondary care during COVID-19 lockdown

ORCID Icon, ORCID Icon, ORCID Icon, , &
Pages 711-716 | Received 26 Aug 2020, Accepted 30 Mar 2021, Published online: 20 May 2021
 

ABSTRACT

Clinical relevance

Following the COVID-19 lockdown, uptake of slitlamp-enabled live teleophthalmology increased. Its use contributed to a reduction of referrals escalated to secondary care during-lockdown (avoided: 64% pre-lockdown vs 86% during-lockdown).

Background

Live teleophthalmology using video conferencing allows real-time, three-way consultation between secondary care, community providers and patients, improving interpretation of slit lamp findings and potentially reducing referrals to secondary care. NHS Forth Valley implemented live teleophthalmology in March 2019. In March 2020, the COVID-19 pandemic created urgency to deliver ophthalmic care while minimising the risk of contracting or spreading the disease. We aim to compare the uptake and two outcomes (number of avoided secondary care referrals; pattern of presenting conditions) of live teleophthalmology consultations in NHS Forth Valley before and during the COVID-19 national lockdown.

Methods

An NHS secure video conferencing platform connected the video slit lamps of optometrists, or an iPad mounted on a slit lamp and viewing through the eyepieces, to a secondary care ophthalmologist via a virtual live clinic/waiting area. Data about avoiding a secondary care referral were extracted from a post-consultation ophthalmologist survey for 14 months of data. Pre- and during-lockdown intervals were before/after 23 March 2020, when routine eyecare appointments were suspended. Numbers of avoided referrals to secondary care and patterns of presenting conditions were compared for pre- and during-lockdown periods.

Results

The COVID-19 pandemic markedly increased use of live teleophthalmology in NHS Forth Valley. Surveys were completed for 164 of 250 (66%) teleophthalmology consultations over the study period. Data from 154 surveys were analysed, 78 and 76 for the pre- and during-lockdown periods, respectively. Significantly more during-lockdown (86%) than pre-lockdown (64%; difference 21%, 95% CI 8–34%, p = 0.001) surveys indicated that referrals to secondary care were avoided.

Conclusion

Survey data from ophthalmologists suggest significantly fewer escalations to secondary care due to teleophthalmology use.

Acknowledgements

The initial pilot was described as part of an MSc in Primary Care Ophthalmology, University of Edinburgh. We would also like to acknowledge Eric Hill, NHS Forth Valley, IT support; John Keenan, Specsavers Alloa; Kirsty Jordan, University of Strathclyde, for the design of the iPad slit lamp adaptors; Linda Hunter, LA Optical and Sebastien Dall’Ozzo, NHS Forth Valley.

Disclosure statement

No potential conflict of interest was reported by the author(s).

Compliance with ethical standards

Following consultation with local NHS Research and Development, this work was classified as an audit of a service development and no ethics approval was required. This work was done in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki 1975.

Additional information

Funding

This work was supported by the Technology Enabled Care Fund, Scottish Government.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.