https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7995-2121
![Sample our Medicine, Dentistry, Nursing & Allied Health journals, sign in here to start your FREE access for 14 days]({"type":"image" , "src" : "/sda/5944/TOC-Subject-Sample-2021-Medicine-Dentistry-Nursing-Allied-Health.jpg"})
ABSTRACT
Clinical relevance
Corneal sensitivity represents an important indicator for corneal health, its innervation and hence also for ocular disease. It is therefore of great interest from a clinical and research perspective to quantify ocular surface sensation.
Background
The aim of this prospective cross-sectional cohort study was to clinically test the within-day and day-to-day repeatability of the new Swiss Liquid Jet Aesthesiometer, employing small droplets of isotonic saline solution for repeatability, and correlate with the Cochet–Bonnet aesthesiometer in a cohort of participants of two different age groups, based on participant feedback (psychophysical method).
Methods
Participants were recruited from two equally, large age groups: group A (18–30 years) and group B (50–70 years). The inclusion criteria were healthy eyes, Ocular Surface Disease Index (OSDI) ≤ 13, and no contact lens wear. Mechanical corneal sensitivity threshold measurements with means of liquid jet and Cochet–Bonnet methods were carried out twice during two visits (a total of four measurements), with a stimulus temperature equal to or slightly above the ocular surface temperature.
Results
Ninety participants completed the study (n = 45 per age group, average age in group A: 24.2 ± 2.94 years, group B: 58.5 ± 5.71 years). The coefficient of repeatability for the liquid jet method was 2.56 dB within visits and 3.61 between visits. For the Cochet–Bonnet method, it was 2.27 dB within visits and 4.42 dB between visits (Bland Altman with bootstrap analysis). Moderate correlation was observed between the liquid jet and the Cochet–Bonnet method (r = 0.540, p < .001, robust linear regression).
Conclusions
Swiss liquid jet aesthesiometry offers a new examiner independent method for corneal sensitivity measurement with acceptable repeatability and moderate correlation with the Cochet–Bonnet aesthesiometer. It offers a large stimulus pressure range of 100–1500 mbar and a precision of 1 mbar. Stimulus intensity can be tuned more precisely and much smaller sensitivity fluctuations may be potentially detected.
Disclosure statement
No potential conflict of interest was reported by the author(s).
Ethics registration
Swissethics (SNCTP) ID 2019-01252; clinicaltrials.gov NCT04045509.