Visual and refractive outcomes following secondary intraocular lens implantation

ABSTRACT

Purpose

To analyze the visual and refractive results after secondary IOL implantation using different surgical techniques - iris-claw aphakic IOL through a corneal incision or scleral tunnel, and 3-piece IOL into the ciliary sulcus.

Patients and methods

Retrospective study including patients that were submitted to secondary IOL implantation from January 2017 to December 2019 at the Department of Ophthalmology of Hospital de Braga, Portugal. We collected demographic data (age, surgical indication, comorbidities, surgical technique, IOL implanted, and intra and postoperative complications) and visual and refractive data [preoperative and 3-month, 6-month, and 12-month postoperative corrected-distance visual acuity (CDVA), spherical equivalent (SE), manifest cylinder, and intraocular pressure].

Results

128 eyes from 123 patients were included. The most frequent surgical indications were IOL subluxation/luxation (62.5%) and intraoperative posterior capsular rupture (23.4%). CDVA improved from 1.26 ± 0.51 to 0.47 ± 0.49 logMar (p < .001). CDVA was significantly better in the 3-piece into the ciliary sulcus IOL group than both other groups. The final SE was −0.68 ± 0.94 diopters. The mean manifest refractive cylinder remained stable until the 6th month after the surgery (p = .454) and improved in the last 6 months of follow-up (p = .015). In the postoperative period, the cylinder was higher in the corneal incision iris-claw aphakic IOL group and lower in the 3-piece IOL into the ciliary sulcus group (p < 0,05). The corneal incision iris-claw aphakic IOL group presented the most postoperative complications.

Conclusion

All techniques showed satisfying results. The 3-piece IOL into the ciliary sulcus group showed the best visual and refractive performance, followed by the scleral tunnel iris-claw IOL group and the corneal incision iris-claw IOL group.

KEYWORDS:

• aphakia
• capsular support
• ciliary sulcus
• iris-claw intraocular lens
• cylinder

Disclosure statement

No potential conflict of interest was reported by the author(s).

Author contributions

All authors contributed to the study conception and design. Material preparation, data collection and analysis were performed by Marina Delgado João, Keissy Sousa, and Jorge Vasco Costa. The first draft of the manuscript was written by Marina Delgado João and all authors commented on previous versions of the manuscript. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Additional information

Funding

The author(s) reported there is no funding associated with the work featured in this article.