97
Views
0
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Research Article

Effect of Topical Pilocarpine Instilled Before Laser Peripheral Iridotomy on Regional Iris Thickness in Primary Angle Closure Disease: A Swept-Source Anterior Segment Optical Coherence Tomography Pilot Study

ORCID Icon, ORCID Icon, , , & ORCID Icon
Pages 579-583 | Received 13 Sep 2022, Accepted 09 Jan 2023, Published online: 30 Jan 2023
 

ABSTRACT

Purpose

To determine whether the temporal-superior or the nasal-superior iris area becomes thinner (more optimal) for laser peripheral iridotomy (LPI) after pilocarpine instillation in primary angle closure disease (PACD); and to identify an angle for optimal penetration of the laser beam.

Patients and Methods

Iris thickness at 2 mm from the iris root in the preset scanning axes was measured using swept-source anterior segment optical coherence tomography before and 60 minutes after the instillation of pilocarpine 2% in one eye of 30 consecutive Japanese PACD patients with thick, dark brown iris. Iris thickness at 1:30 and 10:30 clock hour positions were evaluated in sagittal and oblique directions, resulting sagittal iris thickness (SIT) and minimum iris thickness (MIT) parameters, respectively.

Results

Compared to the baseline values, iris thickness decreased significantly (P < .001) in both locations after pilocarpine instillation. Both before and after pilocarpine instillation the temporal-superior iris thickness was significantly smaller than the nasal-superior thickness (P ≤ .001). After pilocarpine instillation, the temporal-superior iris was significantly thinner in an approximately 13° angle direction temporal to the sagittal direction than in the sagittal direction (MIT: 0.322 mm; SIT: 0.346 mm, P < .001).

Conclusions

After pilocarpine instillation, the temporal-superior iris and an approximately 13° angle temporal to the sagittal direction may provide an optimal location and laser beam angle for LPI in PACD eyes.

DISCLOSURE STATEMENT

No potential conflict of interest was reported by the author(s).

AUTHOR CONTRIBUTIONS

YK designed the study, acquired, analyzed, and interpreted the patient data, and drafted the manuscript. GH designed the study, interpreted the patient data, and drafted the manuscript. YK and GH had identical role in this work. TM acquired the patient data. YE analyzed the patient data. RK analysed the patient data and drafted the manuscript. AH contributed to the conception of this study and revised the manuscript. The authors read and approved the final manuscript.

ETHICS APPROVAL AND INFORMED CONSENT

The Kyorin University Institutional Review Board for Human Research approved the study protocol, and the study was conducted according to the tenets of the Declaration of Helsinki. Written informed consent was obtained from all participants before the measurements.

Additional information

Funding

The author(s) reported there is no funding associated with the work featured in this article.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.