Abstract
Academic entitlement, a term used to reflect students' expectation for success regardless of personal effort, has become a growing issue at many universities. This study examined the relationship between college students' academic beliefs (i.e., academic entitlement, grade orientation, learner orientation, self-efficacy) and their motives for communicating with their instructor. Participants were 184 undergraduate students who completed a series of self-report scales. Students' level of academic entitlement was positively related to their grade orientation but negatively related to their self-efficacy. Results of a canonical correlation revealed that students who were learning oriented, but not grade oriented, and possessed self-efficacy communicated with their instructor for relational and participatory reasons. Students who were academically entitled and grade oriented communicated with their instructor for sycophantic reasons and to a lesser extent for participatory reasons but not for functional reasons.
Notes
*p < .05, **p < .01, ***p < .001.
Validity support for the measures used in this investigation can be found in the following articles: See Kopp et al. (Citation2011) for the Academic Entitlement Questionnaire, Eison et al. (Citation1986) for the LOGO-II scale, Pintrich et al. (Citation1993) for the Motivated Strategies for Learning Questionnaire, and Martin et al. (Citation1999) for the Student Communication Motives Scale.