Abstract
The current study advances the literature on psychological reactance theory by examining the moderating role of message elaboration on the reactance process. Participants (N = 512) were randomly assigned to a message condition (freedom-threatening vs. non-freedom-threatening language) in a between-subjects quasi-experimental design. Message elaboration was not manipulated but rather varied naturally. Two topics were examined (energy conservation and organ donation). Results demonstrated that freedom-threatening language was positively associated with perceived freedom threat for both topics. No interaction effect of message elaboration and freedom-threatening language on perceived freedom threat was observed for either topic. Findings are discussed in terms of the theoretical and practical contributions of the current study.
Disclosure statement
No potential conflict of interest was reported by the author.
Notes
1. Percentages may not add up to 100% as participants were allowed to indicate multiple categories.
2. MLR corrects for nonnormality in data. Preliminary analyses revealed that anger was both skewed (|2.0|) and kurtotic (|2.0|) for both topics.