A hybrid information retrieval (IR) system to drive case-based reasoning (CBR) in legal domains is presented. The paper points out the assumptions made and processes involved in a typical mental conceptualization an intuitive model of how human beings represent, recognize and retrieve concepts. The world of general discourse is simplified into a narrow domain, limiting the set of concepts, terms, and structures. The limitation allows the application of stereotypical scenarios. Legislators' professional work creates, based on the logic of law, a natural basis for an indexing and retrieving structure which can be used as a front-end processor for a legal CBR system. The practical application of the combined IR-CBR system is demonstrated by experiments in Bankruptcy Case Law. The natural language description of a novel situation (case text) is the input, which is automatically classified for the production of similar cases' lists.
Free access
Reprints and Corporate Permissions
Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?
To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:
Academic Permissions
Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?
Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:
If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.
Related research
People also read lists articles that other readers of this article have read.
Recommended articles lists articles that we recommend and is powered by our AI driven recommendation engine.
Cited by lists all citing articles based on Crossref citations.
Articles with the Crossref icon will open in a new tab.