An Evolutionary Multi-objective Optimization Technique to Deploy the IoT Services in Fog-enabled Networks: An Autonomous Approach

ABSTRACT

The Internet of Things (IoT) generates countless amounts of data, much of which is processed in cloud data centers. When data is transferred to the cloud over longer distances, there is a long latency in IoT services. Therefore, in order to increase the speed of service provision, resources should be placed close to the user (i.e., at the edge of the network). To address this challenge, a new paradigm called Fog Computing was introduced and added as a layer in the IoT architecture. Fog computing is a decentralized computing infrastructure in which provides storage and computing in the vicinity of IoT devices instead of sending to the cloud. Hence, fog computing can provide less latency and better Quality of Service (QoS) for real-time applications than cloud computing. In general, the theoretical foundations of fog computing have already been presented, but the problem of IoT services placement to fog nodes is still challenging and has attracted much attention from researchers. In this paper, a conceptual computing framework based on fog-cloud control middleware is proposed to optimally IoT services placement. Here, this problem is formulated as an automated planning model for managing service requests due to some limitations that take into account the heterogeneity of applications and resources. To solve the problem of IoT services placement, an automated evolutionary approach based on Particle Swarm Optimization (PSO) has been proposed with the aim of making maximize the utilization of fog resources and improving QoS. Experimental studies on a synthetic environment have been evaluated based on various metrics including services performed, waiting time, failed services, services cost, services remaining, and runtime. The results of the comparisons showed that the proposed framework based on PSO performs better than the state-of-the-art methods.

Disclosure statement

No potential conflict of interest was reported by the author(s).