Publication Cover
CRANIO®
The Journal of Craniomandibular & Sleep Practice
Volume 15, 1997 - Issue 3
24
Views
3
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
OCCLUSION

Chewing Movements in Near Ideal Occlusion With and Without TM Symptoms

Pages 208-220 | Received 03 Dec 1996, Accepted 03 Mar 1997, Published online: 13 Jul 2016
 

ABSTRACT

Orthodontic models hand-articulated into maximum intercuspation of 720 untreated subjects were evaluated by 17 criteria for grading an ideal anatomic occlusion including good dental interdigitation and alignments. Of the 720 subjects screened, the best 17 subjects were divided into three groups that contained 11 near ideal occlusions scored with 92–98%, three lower evaluated occlusions scored with 86–88% and three near ideal occlusions with TM signs or symptoms scored with 90–94%, Border and chewing movements were recorded using incisor tracking instrument (Visitrainer, model 3). Border movements in asymptomatic subjects demonstrated a well-defined intercuspal position, smooth and equal lateral excursions, and straight opening/closing movements. However, one subject with pain of right joint recorded an inconsistent intercuspal position, restricted excursions and a deviated path corresponding to a reciprocal click in opening/closing movements. Chewing movements in asymptomatic subjects with near ideal occlusion demonstrated either no or a lower rate of opening gliding tooth contact along the lateral border movement on non-working side, and a higher rate of closing gliding tooth contact along border movement on the working side. Chewing movements in symptomatic subjects with near ideal occlusion showed opening and closing without gliding along the lateral excursions, and closing point was inconsistent with maximum intercuspal position in the pain subject. In examining these near ideal occlusion subjects, the different characteristic chewing and border movements were defined for subjects with and without TM symptoms, respectively. Asymptomatic subjects with near ideal occlusion and lower evaluated occlusion showed almost the same chewing function. The goal of orthodontic treatment might be anatomic ideal occlusion with good chewing and border movements indicated in this study.

Additional information

Notes on contributors

Yukio Arakawa

Dr. Yukio Arakawa received his D.D.S. degree in 1974 and his Ph.D. degree in 1981 from Tokyo Dental College, Chiba, Japan. Dr. Arakawa is a lecturer in the Department of Orthodontics at Tokyo Dental College. For 15 years his private practice in Tokyo has been limited to orthodontic treatment. He is a certified orthodontic instructor of the Japan Orthodontic Society.

Hideharu Yamaguchi

Dr. Hideharu Yamaguchi received his D.D.S. degree in 1967 and his Ph.D. degree in 1971 from Tokyo Dental College, Chiba, Japan. Dr. Yamaguchi is an Associate Professor in the Department of Orthodontics at Tokyo Dental College. He has been involved in research related to the recording of border and chewing movement, TMD and MRI before and after orthodontic treatment. He is a certified orthodontic instructor of the Japan Orthodontic Society.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.