ABSTRACT
Background: This paper describes the development of an urban adolescent text messaging tobacco cessation intervention and preliminary findings from a randomized, controlled trial. The authors successfully adapted a face-to-face intervention into a personalized, automated, and interactive 5-day texting protocol. Methods: Respondent-driven sampling was used beginning at a community substance abuse facility. Seventy-two tobacco-dependent adolescents were randomized into an automated computer texting program that delivered either the experimental condition of 30 motivational interviewing– and social network counseling–based personalized messages or the attention control condition consisting of a texting program covering general (non–smoking-related) health habits. All teens were provided smartphones for the study and were assessed at baseline and at 1, 3, and 6 months post intervention. Analyses examined condition × time interactions. Results: At 6 months, the experimental condition decreased the number of cigarettes smoked in the past 30 days, increased intentions not to smoke in the future, and increased peer social support compared with controls. Effect sizes were moderate to large. Conclusions: These findings are unique, as they target urban adolescents with a mobile health format and add to the growing literature on the efficacy of text-delivered interventions.
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
The authors would like to acknowledge the participants in our study and for the Richmond Behavioral Health Authority and the Discovery Projects for allowing access to their patient population.
AUTHOR CONTRIBUTIONS
M.M. served as the lead investigator and author. L.C., T.W., L.K.-M., E.B., J.M., J.Z., L.K., J.M., and D.R.S. served as co-investigators and authors.
Funding
This research was supported by the Virginia Foundation for Healthy Youth, grant no. 8520894 Mod 1. The findings and conclusions are those of the authors and do not necessarily represent the views of the Virginia Foundation for Healthy Youth. The authors declare that they have no conflicts of interest.