![Sample our Health and Social Care journals, sign in here to start your FREE access for 14 days]({"type":"image" , "src" : "/sda/5938/TOC-Subject-Sample-2021-Health-Social-Care.jpg"})
ABSTRACT
Background: Molly is one form of MDMA (3,4-methylenedioxymethamphetamine) that is touted to be more “pure” and potentially less harmful than other forms, such as ecstasy. Media reports and case studies suggest that this drug is popular among college students and is related to adverse health problems. The current study sought to address the knowledge gaps about Molly by examining whether users differ in substance use outcomes and sensation seeking than nonusers. Specifically, this study tested whether Molly users engaged in heavier use of other substances and experienced more substance-related harms in general than nonusers. Further, the current study investigated whether Molly users exhibited higher levels of sensation seeking than nonusers. Lastly, this study examined whether Molly user status would be associated with substance-related harms beyond the confounding influence of other substance use and trait sensation seeking. Methods: Participants were 710 (71.9% female) college alcohol drinkers who completed self-report surveys about substance use (i.e., Molly, alcohol, and other drug use), substance-related problems, and sensation seeking. Results: Results revealed that approximately 12% of the sample reported lifetime Molly use. Molly users compared with nonusers reported higher levels of other drug use, alcohol use, substance-related problems, and sensation seeking. Further, Molly users reported experiencing poorer substance use outcomes (e.g., blacking out, academic/occupational problems, and withdrawal symptoms) after accounting for sensation seeking and other substance use. Conclusions: These findings indicate that Molly users are higher in sensation seeking and that use is uniquely related to greater risk for substance-related harms. These preliminary findings demonstrate a need for correcting possible misperceptions regarding the purity of Molly and educating users on the potential for experiencing associated harms. Such information could be used to develop efficacious prevention programming for college students.
Author contributions
All authors significantly contributed to the manuscript. Ashley N. Linden-Carmichael wrote the Introduction and Discussion sections and conducted statistical analyses. Amy L. Stamates wrote the Results section, aided in conducting statistical analyses, and assisted in editing the manuscript. Brynn E. Sheehan wrote the Methods section, administered data collection, and edited the manuscript. Cathy Lau-Barraco provided substantial feedback in study design and conceptualization in addition to editing drafts of the paper. The authors declare that they have no conflicts of interest.
Funding
Ashley N. Linden-Carmichael is supported by the Ruth L. Kirschstein National Research Service Award (F31-AA023118) from the National Institute on Alcohol Abuse and Alcoholism (NIAAA). The content is solely the responsibility of the authors, and the NIAAA had no other role other than financial support.