Abstract
This study examined the relationships between instructors’ use of antisocial behavior alteration techniques (BATs) and students’ use of teacher‐owned resistance strategies. College students (N = 190) completed questionnaires assessing their perceptions of their instructor's communication and their own behaviors in the classroom. Results of a canonical correlation suggest that a combination of higher levels of instructor use of the punishment from teacher, punishment from others, guilt, negative relationship, legitimate teacher authority, and debt BATs corresponds with a combination of higher levels of student resistance through teacher advice, teacher blame, appeal to powerful others, and modeling teacher's affect.