Abstract
National Forests in the United States have undergone a spatially and temporally uneven governance transition in response to social and economic pressures and contemporary policy changes, with many national forest units moving from a wholly government-led “dominant federal” model to a more collaborative “social forestry” model in which nonfederal actors have greater influence and authority. Here we report on an effort to develop a suite of indicators designed to capture some of the most tangible elements of a transition from dominant federal to social forestry modes of governance. We pilot test these data on the Willamette National Forest using data from a variety of sources internal and external to the USDA Forest Service. We assess the suitability of these indicators for tracking governance transitions and discuss their applicability to other national forest units nationwide.
Note
Acknowledgements
We would like to sincerely thank our partners on the Willamette National Forest, Regions 4 and 6 of the USDA Forest Service, Oregon Department of Forestry, and the Southern Willamette Forest Collaborative for their assistance in accessing the data used here. Special thanks to Jennifer Sorensen, Cheryl Friesen, Bruce Andersen, David Seesholtz, Emily Jane Davis, Sarah Altemus-Pope, and Johan Hogervorst.
Notes
1 Data limitations did not allow us to conduct statistical tests of internal consistency on these indices. Future work with larger datasets would create opportunities to do so.