![Sample our Environment & Sustainability journals, sign in here to start your access, latest two full volumes FREE to you for 14 days]({"type":"image" , "src" : "/sda/5935/TOC-Subject-Sample-2021-Environment-Sustainability.jpg"})
Abstract
In many resource governance systems, representatives of resource-related organizations gather in forums to discuss and develop solutions to policy problems. Forums often deal with interdependent policy problems, giving rise to institutional externalities: instances where decisions made in one forum either decrease (negative institutional externality) or increase (positive institutional externality) the rate by which current policy outputs in other forums resolve their prescribed policy problems. In this article we argue that forum-specific factors can impact the direction of such externalities. We theorize that forums with more diverse memberships in terms of both the issues that participants care about and types of organizations represented are better equipped to incorporate more holistic, ecosystem-based perspectives, which promote the generation of positive institutional externalities. Our study utilizes survey data collected from forum participants in the California Delta. Results from a series of cross-nested regressions demonstrate a positive association between forum diversity and positive externalities.
Notes
Notes
1 Diversity has been operationalized in numerous ways in the resource governance, collaborative governance, and participation literatures (see Moore and Koontz Citation2003; Koontz and Moore Johnson Citation2004; Koontz et al. Citation2004; Maag and Fischer Citation2018). We chose organizational and issue diversity as they have been commonly studied across fields.
2 Organization types include: federal government; state government; local government; regional government; water infrastructure special district; environmental special district; environmental group; trade/business/industry group; homeowners association; education/consulting/research; multi-stakeholder coalition; political party; recreational group; agriculture; media; other.
3 For example, trust, rules, transparency, power asymmetries, (Ansell and Gash Citation2008) principled engagement or shared motivation (Emerson, Nabatchi and Balogh Citation2012) may play a role.
