Almost all basic research and economic and policy analysis on global environmental issues is done in the North. Dissemination of findings is not widespread and their relevance to developing countries is not assessed. A good example of this discontinuity can be found in the arguments surrounding the global warming debate. Several studies from the South have indicated that most Northern studies overestimate Southern emissions and responsibilities. The central points of this article are that the North understates the potential costs of reducing energy consumption in the South, and the economic policy usually advocated in the North to curb carbon emissions—a carbon tax—is among the most costly alternatives for the South.
Developing countries and international environmental negotiations: The risks of poorly informed choices
Reprints and Corporate Permissions
Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?
To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:
Academic Permissions
Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?
Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:
If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.
Related research
People also read lists articles that other readers of this article have read.
Recommended articles lists articles that we recommend and is powered by our AI driven recommendation engine.
Cited by lists all citing articles based on Crossref citations.
Articles with the Crossref icon will open in a new tab.