214
Views
1
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Original Research

Intestinal Epithelial Stem Cells: Distinct Behavior After Surgical Injury and Teduglutide Administration

, MD, , BSc, PhD, , BSc, PhD, , BSc, , BSc, PhD, , MD, PhD, , MD, PhD, , MD, PhD & , MD, PhD show all
Pages 243-252 | Received 21 Dec 2016, Accepted 08 Feb 2017, Published online: 31 Mar 2017
 

ABSTRACT

Background: Previous studies suggest that intestinal epithelial stem cells (IESC), critical drivers of homeostasis and regeneration, include two subpopulations: crypt-based columnar and “position +4” stem cells, identified by Lgr5 and Bmi1 biomarkers, respectively. Teduglutide is an enterotrophic counterpart of glucagon-like peptide 2. This study aimed to investigate the response of putative IESC to surgical injury and teduglutide administration on an animal model of intestinal resection and anastomosis. Methods: Wistar rats (n = 59) were distributed into four groups: “Ileal Resection” versus “Laparotomy”, subsequently subdivided into “Postoperative Teduglutide Administration” versus “No Treatment”; and sacrificed at third or seventh days, with ileal sample harvesting. Flow cytometry was used to analyze epithelial stem cells with monoclonal antibodies against Lgr5, Bmi1 and also CD44, CD24, CD166, and Grp78 surface markers. Results: Surgical trauma induced an increase of epithelial stem cells population at third day (9.0 ± 0.3 versus 5.7 ± 0.3%, p = 0.0001), which was more intense and involved all subpopulations after ileal resection. At seventh day, teduglutide was significantly associated with higher proportion of Lgr5+/Bmi1 cells (5.8 ± 0.1 versus 2.9 ± 0.3%, p = 0.005) and, on the contrary, lower percentage of Lgr5/Bmi1+ cells (0.03 ± 0.01 versus 1.9 ± 0.1%, p = 0.049) after ileal resection; and higher proportion of Lgr5+/Bmi1+ cells (1.7 ± 0.1 versus 1.1 ± 0.2%, p = 0.028) after isolated laparotomy. After surgery, Lgr5+/Bmi1 and Lgr5/Bmi1+ subpopulations demonstrated an inverse correlation and both correlated negatively with Grp78 labeling index. Lgr5/Bmi1+ and CD44+/CD24low/CD166+/Grp78+ cells proportions exhibited a high grade positive correlation. Conclusion: Those observations support the existence of two epithelial stem cells subpopulations with distinct behavior after surgical injury and teduglutide treatment.

This article is referred to by:
Teduglutide-induced stem cell function in intestinal repair

ABBREVIATIONS

Bmi1=

B cell-specific Maloney murine leukemia virus integration region 1.

CK18=

Cytokeratin 18.

CD45=

Cluster of differentiation 45.

CD31=

Cluster of differentiation 31.

CD166=

Cluster of differentiation 166.

CD24=

Cluster of differentiation 24.

CD44=

Cluster of differentiation 44.

FACS=

Fluorescence-activated cell sorting.

Grp78=

78 KDa glucose-regulated protein.

Hopx=

Homeodomain-only.

K3EDTA=

K3 ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid.

Lgr5=

Leucine-rich repeat-containing G-protein coupled receptor.

Lrig1=

Leucine-rich repeats and immunoglobulin-like domains 1.

SEM=

Standard error of the mean.

Tert=

Telomerase reverse transcriptase.

USF=

United States Pharmacopeia.

vs.=

versus

α-Sma=

α-smooth muscle actin.

σ=

Spearman's correlation coefficient.

ACKNOWLEDGMENTS

Not applicable.

DECLARATION OF INTEREST

The authors report no conflicts of interest. The authors alone are responsible for the content and writing of the paper.

FUNDING

The authors declare no funding for the research.

ORIGINAL COMMUNICATION

This manuscript represents an original research that was not submitted elsewhere for publication and that will not be sent to another journal until a decision is made concerning publication.

This study was partially presented as an oral communication at the 37th European Society for Clinical Nutrition and Metabolism (ESPEN) Congress, Lisbon, in September 8th, 2015 and the abstract was published in Clinical Nutrition [Costa BP, Sarmento-Ribeiro AB, Gonçalves AC, Botelho F, Abrantes M, F. Castro Sousa: Response of putative intestinal epithelial stem cells to surgical injury and teduglutide administration on an animal model. Clin Nutr 2015; 34 (Supp1):S19].

ETHICS APPROVAL

Study was implemented in accordance with the national animals' welfare guidelines and was authorized by the Ethics Committee of Faculty of Medicine, University of Coimbra, Coimbra, Portugal.

STATEMENT OF AUTHORSHIP

All the authors have made substantial contributions to the preparation of the manuscript.

AUTHORS' CONTRIBUTIONS

Study conception and design: Costa B

Acquisition of data: Costa B, Gonçalves AC, Abrantes AM, Matafome P, Alves R

Analysis and interpretation of data: Costa B

Drafting of manuscript: Costa B

Critical review: Seiça R, Sarmento-Ribeiro AB, Botelho MF, Castro Sousa F

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.