185
Views
2
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Original Research

The Effects of Positive End-Expiratory Pressure at Different Levels on Postoperative Respiration Parameters in Patients Undergoing Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy

, MD, , Assist. Prof. Dr., , Assist. Prof. Dr., , Assist. Prof. Dr. & , Assoc. Prof. Dr.
Pages 114-120 | Received 15 Jan 2017, Accepted 15 Feb 2017, Published online: 24 Mar 2017
 

ABSTRACT

Purpose/Aim of the study: We investigated the effects of different positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP) levels on postoperative respiration parameters in patients undergoing laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Materials and Methods: One hundred and five consecutive patients were randomly divided to three groups (n = 35, for each group). Group I did not receive PEEP whereas group II received PEEP as 5 cmH2O and group III received PEEP as 8 cm H2O. Measurements with spirometer were taken 1 hour before the operation (T1) and, 1 (T2), 6 (T3), and 24 hours (T4) after extubation by an anesthetist. Forced expiratory volume (FEV1), forced vital capacity (FVC), and peak expiratory flow (PEF) were recorded. Results: Group I had higher FVC values measured at T2 time point compared with other groups (p < 0.05, for both groups). There was a statistically significant difference between group I and group III in terms of the FVC values measured at T3 and T4 time points (p = 0.05 and p < 0.05, retrospectively). A statistical difference was found between group I and group II in terms of FEV1 measured at T2 time point (p < 0.05). Group I had higher FEV1 values measured at T3 and T4 time points compared to group III (p = 0.05, P<0.05; respectively). Group III had lower PEF values measured at T4 time point compared to group I and II (p < 0.05). Conclusions: We concluded that PEEP with 5 or 8 cmH2O has negative effects on lung function tests measured with spirometer during postoperative 1st, 6th, and 24th hours in patients underwent elective laparoscopic cholecystectomy.

Declaration of interest: The authors report no conflicts of interest. The authors alone are responsible for the content and writing of the paper.

FUNDING

There is no funding for the research.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.