184
Views
5
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Original Research

The Global End-Diastolic Volume (GEDV) Could Be More Appropiate to Fluid Management Than Central Venous Pressure (CVP) During Closed Hyperthermic Intrabdominal Chemotherapy with CO2 Circulation

, PhD, MD, , PhD, MD, , PhD, MD, , PhD, MD, , MD, , MD, , PhD & , PhD, MD show all
Pages 321-327 | Received 05 May 2017, Accepted 27 Apr 2017, Published online: 30 May 2017
 

ABSTRACT

Background: Closed hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC) may increase abdominal pressure and effects of hemodynamic changes due to maintenance hyperthermia. Our aim was to analyze the safety and effectiveness of our closed technique with CO2 circulation in management fluid status and hemodynamic parameters by means of cardiac preload control measured by Global End Diastolic Values (GEDV) and a gas exchanger. Material and Methods: A Pilot Clinical Study that included 18 advanced ovarian cancer patients undergoing citoreductive surgery and HIPEC. We used a closed-perfusion system (PRS Combat®) that includes CO2 circulation and a gas exchanger. Transpulmonary thermodilutions and hemodynamic measurements (PiCCO2®) were performed after citoreductive surgery (Pre-HIPEC); At half time of the HIPEC (Intra-HIPEC); After HIPEC (Post-HIPEC). Results: No significant hemodynamic measurements changes in the three thermodilutions values of Cardiac Index (CI) (p = 0.227), Global End Diastolic Values (GEVD) (p = 0.966), Stroke Volume Variation (SVV) (p = 0,884) and Systemic Vascular Resistance Index (SVRI) (p = 0.082). No correlation between central venous pressure (CVP) and GEDV (Pre-HIPEC: r = 0.164, p = 0.211; Intra-HIPEC: r = 0.015, p = 0.900; Post-HIPEC: r = 0.018, p = 0.890). There was better correlation between GEDV and CI (Pre-HIPEC: r = 0.432, p = 0.071; Intra-HIPEC: r = 0.418, p = 0.074; Post-HIPEC: r = 0.411, p = 0.080). Conclusions: Closed intrabdominal chemotherapy with CO2 circulation model may be a safe model for HIPEC by means of a gas exchanger. GEDV and its changes significantly correlated to CI, and not observed for CVP. GEDV values may be more appropriate for monitoring cardiac preload, blood loss limitation and to predict changes in intravascular volume status during intraperitoneal chemotherapy.

Conflict of interest: All authors have no conflict of interest.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.