541
Views
13
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Original Research

Does Suture Material Affect Uterine Scar Healing After Cesarean Section? Results from a Randomized Controlled Trial

ORCID Icon, ORCID Icon, ORCID Icon, ORCID Icon &
Pages 763-769 | Received 19 Jan 2018, Accepted 26 Mar 2018, Published online: 18 Apr 2018
 

ABSTRACT

Background: Impaired healing of the uterine scar after cesarean has been associated with adverse gynecological and obstetric outcomes. Although a large number of studies have been conducted on the events leading to this, information obtained from prospective randomized studies examining the role of suture material in the formation of cesarean scar defect (CSD) is lacking. Objective: To evaluate the effects of synthetic suture materials on CSD formation. Study design: We performed a two-arm 1:1 randomized study in women with singleton pregnancies undergoing elective primary cesarean delivery after the 38th week of gestation. Uterine scar closure was performed using synthetic absorbable monofilament and multifilament sutures. The primary outcome was residual myometrial thickness (RMT) in the area of the scar, measured by transvaginal ultrasound 6–9 months after birth. Secondary outcomes included differences in mean operative time, mean estimated blood loss at the time of surgery, and the rates of postoperative gynecological sequelae. Results: Complete follow-up was obtained from 94 (88%) of 107 participants. RMT was thicker in the monofilament compared to the multifilament suture group (5.5 ± 2.24 vs. 4.18 ± 1.76, p = 0.01). Hemoglobin delta was higher in the monofilament suture group (1.59 ± 0.96 vs. 1.25 ± 0.60, p = 0.04). There was no statistically significant difference between the monofilament suture and multifilament suture groups in terms of gynecological sequelae. Conclusion: Closure of the uterine scar with monofilament suture has a positive effect on scar healing and increases RMT thickness.

This article refers to:
Uterine Scar Healing After Cesarean Section: Managing an Old Surgery in an Evidence-Based Environment

DECLARATION OF INTEREST

No potential conflicts of interest were disclosed.

Authorship Credits

The authors declare that are qualified for authorship and have participated sufficiently in the work to take public responsibility for appropriate portions of the content. The authors declare that they made a substantial contribution to the concept or design of the work; or acquisition, analysis, or interpretation of data, drafted article or revised it critically for important intellectual content, approved the version to be published, and each author has participated sufficiently in the work and taken public responsibility for appropriate portions of the content.

ACKNOWLEDGMENT

The English in this document has been checked by at least two professional editors, both native speakers of English. For a certificate, please see: http://www.textcheck.com/certificate/IbfNSq

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.