396
Views
5
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Original Research

Tissue Engineering for the Ovine Rotator Cuff: Surgical Anatomy, Approach, Implantation and Histology Technique, along with Review of Literature

, &
 

Abstract

Aim: Tissue engineering is a contemporary topic, which is widely discussed in shoulder surgery. The preclinical success of tissue engineering has not yet fully translated to clinical studies. In this study, we present our experience in this subject and discuss measurements to analyze the sheep tissue as comparative model. We also present a comprehensive systematic review of the literature in relation to tissue engineering and rotator cuff. Method: We studied the anatomy, histology and surgical approach of 24 infraspinatus tendons specimens in sheep and focused on certain measurements such as: (1) size of the normal tendon; (2) diameter of the normal footprint; and (3) bone hardness of the footprint using a durometer. Blood from six sheep was obtained and processed to produce platelet rich plasma using both the Harvest Smartprep and Cascade kit. We then outlined an approach to the infraspinatus tendon footprint in preparation for implantation of a biological augmentation material, which was repaired using a double row technique. This was followed by a histological analysis. Results: The average measurements of the footprint were 21 mm ×21 mm, the tendon length was 35.1 mm and the width proximal and distal was 21.9 and 14 mm, respectively. The average bone hardness at the 12, 3, 6, and 9 o’clock position was 64.1, 52.3, 50.1, and 37.7 respectively. Central footprint and lateral edge hardness was 44.8 and 43.4. Only the Harvest Smartprep and using a modified method, was able to produce a platelet concentration factor of 4. The Cascade method was unable to concentrate sheep blood. Conclusion: The sheep model is a suitable tissue for studying the rotator cuff. The researcher must be aware of certain interspecies caveats. Clinical tissue engineering and surgical techniques must be modified in order to be suitable when using sheep model.

ACKNOWLEDGEMENT

Information about institutional review board (IRB): All animal experiments were approved by the University of Cambridge Animal Welfare Ethical Review Board and conformed to the British Home Office Regulations (Animal Scientific Procedures Act 1986; Project Licence PPL 80/2269)

DECLARATION OF INTEREST

The authors report no conflicts of interest. The authors alone are responsible for the content and writing of the paper.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.