![Sample our Medicine, Dentistry, Nursing & Allied Health journals, sign in here to start your FREE access for 14 days]({"type":"image" , "src" : "/sda/5944/TOC-Subject-Sample-2021-Medicine-Dentistry-Nursing-Allied-Health.jpg"})
Abstract
Background
This study aimed to investigate the effect of double-lumen irrigation-suction tube (DLIST) in the management of surgical site infections (SSIs) after enterocutaneous fistula (ECF) excisions.
Method
From January 2016 to December 2017 medical records of patients with ECF excisions were reviewed. Patients with primary superficial SSI were divided into group a (treated with DLIST) and b (treated with delayed primary closures). Patients with primary deep SSI were divided into group A (treated with DLIST) and B (treated with vacuum-assisted closure [VAC]). The effect of the DLIST was evaluated.
Results
There were 32 in group a and 27 in group b. The therapeutic time and cost in group a were lower (13.13 ± 2.37 d vs. 24.89 ± 7.44 d; p < .001; $1456 ± 302 vs.$2784 ± 583; p < .001). There were 21 in group A and 23 in group B. While the therapeutic time of group A was longer, the cost was lower ($1717 ± 404 vs. $2636 ± 592; p < .001).
Conclusions
Placing DLIST is an effective and cheap method to treat superficial SSI after ECF excisions. The cost of DLIST in treatment of deep SSI is lower, while the effect of VAC is better.
Acknowledgments
Xin Xu, Minghuang and Risheng Zhao collected and analyzed the data; Zheng Yao, and Weiliang Tian wrote the main manuscript text; Xin Xu prepared figures. Risheng Zhao and Yunzhao Zhao designed the research.
Disclosure statement
The authors report no conflicts of interest. The authors alone are responsible for the content and writing of the paper.
Informed consent
Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study necessary.