![Sample our Medicine, Dentistry, Nursing & Allied Health journals, sign in here to start your FREE access for 14 days]({"type":"image" , "src" : "/sda/5944/TOC-Subject-Sample-2021-Medicine-Dentistry-Nursing-Allied-Health.jpg"})
Abstract
Introduction
Surgical management of jejuno-ileal atresia/stenosis (JIA) is shifting to a minimally invasive approach. Our purpose is to evaluate the safety and feasibility of laparoscopy-assisted surgery (LAS) in JIA by comparing outcomes with a control group of open surgery (OS).
Methods
A retrospective review of JIA cases was performed. Demographic, surgical, and outcomes data were extracted. LAS cases were compared with OS. Fisher's exact-test for qualitative and Mann-Whitney-test for quantitative values were used. p values <0.05 were considered significant.
Results
Forty-seven patients (24/23, F/M) were included. In 19 (40%), the LAS technique was successfully performed, while 3 (17%) required conversion to OS. No differences were observed between the LAS and OS (n = 28) groups concerning demographic data (sex, mean gestational age, mean weight, associated anomalies) and type of JIA. Operative time was shorter in LAS (112 ± 46 min) compared to OS (138 ± 40 min), p = 0.04. Time to start enteral feeding and time to full enteral was shorter in LAS compared to OS, p = 0.04. No difference was observed between the two groups concerning duration of parenteral nutrition, length of hospitalization and weight at discharge. Overall rate of postoperative complications was 14% (n = 7), with a slightly prevalence in OS (18%) compared to LAS (10%), p = 0.68.
Conclusions
The LAS technique in the treatment of neonatal JIA is safe and feasible. LAS is associated with shorter operative and restoration of enteral feeding times. The post-operative outcomes in LAS are similar with OS, with a lower rate of postoperative complications.
Disclosure statement
All authors declare no conflicts of interest, real or perceived, financial or nonfinancial.
Research involving human participants and/or animals
All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and/or national research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards.
Informed consent
Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study.